Re: dtrace bitfields failure (was: 12.3-RC1 fails ...)

2022-01-04 Thread Peter
Hija, sadly, I was too early in agreeing that the two patches 22082f15f9 68396709e7 together do solve the issue. They only do on a certain assumption, which does not hold true in all cases. Let's look at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27213 This is the code in question that will tri

Re: dtrace bitfields failure (was: 12.3-RC1 fails ...)

2022-01-04 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Peter wrote: > > Hija, > > sadly, I was too early in agreeing that the two patches > 22082f15f9 > 68396709e7 > together do solve the issue. They only do on a certain assumption, > which does not hold true in all cases. > > > Let's look at ht

Re: dtrace bitfields failure (was: 12.3-RC1 fails ...)

2022-01-04 Thread Peter
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:01:55PM -0500, Mark Johnston wrote: ! On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Peter wrote: ! > ! > Hija, ! > ! > sadly, I was too early in agreeing that the two patches ! > 22082f15f9 ! > 68396709e7 ! > together do solve the issue. They only do on a certai

Re: dtrace bitfields failure (was: 12.3-RC1 fails ...)

2022-01-04 Thread Mark Johnston
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 10:58:13PM +0100, Peter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 01:01:55PM -0500, Mark Johnston wrote: > ! On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 04:05:53PM +0100, Peter wrote: > ! > > ! > Hija, > ! > > ! > sadly, I was too early in agreeing that the two patches > ! > 22082f15f9 > ! >