Re: Should kernel modules be executable?

2025-01-02 Thread Miroslav Lachman
On 02/01/2025 11:15, Zhenlei Huang wrote: On Jan 2, 2025, at 5:05 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Zhenlei Huang writes: Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> writes: Previously there were about 25 files with permission r-xr-xr-x and 871 with other permissions (mainly -r--r--r--). But on the

[Bug 283755] ports-mgmt/pkg: pkg-upgrade(8) - version comparison new kernel modules ("kmods") failure

2025-01-02 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283755 --- Comment #2 from Eric --- (in reply to comment #1) Thanks. With the suggested settings, it seems the following sequence of two commands is a practicle work-around at the moment: pkg upgrade -r FreeBSD pkg upgrade -r FreeBSD-kmods

Re: Should kernel modules be executable?

2025-01-02 Thread Zhenlei Huang
> On Jan 2, 2025, at 5:05 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > Zhenlei Huang writes: >> Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> writes: >>> Previously there were about 25 files with permission r-xr-xr-x and >>> 871 with other permissions (mainly -r--r--r--). >>> But on the FreeBSD 14.2 (upgraded by

Re: Should kernel modules be executable?

2025-01-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Zhenlei Huang writes: > Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> writes: > > Previously there were about 25 files with permission r-xr-xr-x and > > 871 with other permissions (mainly -r--r--r--). > > But on the FreeBSD 14.2 (upgraded by freebsd-update), there are 809 > > files with r-xr-xr-x permission