On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, 10:21 PM George Michaelson wrote:
> how "generic" is the initial boot selector? If I have one already
> which points to debian on the same MMC, is there any point installing
> the FreeBSD one? the generic one I have chain loads what looks like
> grub. I want to minimise dama
how "generic" is the initial boot selector? If I have one already
which points to debian on the same MMC, is there any point installing
the FreeBSD one? the generic one I have chain loads what looks like
grub. I want to minimise damage to the MMC and so don't want to
destroy this state if I can, bu
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024, 3:47 PM George Michaelson wrote:
> I feel in a bit of a corner case window regarding UEFI boot configuration,
> multiple disks, and zfs. Ignorance is not bliss.
>
> Probably it's UEFI clue more than FreeBSD clue I lack, but the target OS
> is a zfs backed FreeBSD.
>
> Which
On 15 Mar 2024, at 22:46, George Michaelson wrote:
>
> I feel in a bit of a corner case window regarding UEFI boot configuration,
> multiple disks, and zfs. Ignorance is not bliss.
>
> Probably it's UEFI clue more than FreeBSD clue I lack, but the target OS is a
> zfs backed FreeBSD.
>
> Whic
I feel in a bit of a corner case window regarding UEFI boot configuration,
multiple disks, and zfs. Ignorance is not bliss.
Probably it's UEFI clue more than FreeBSD clue I lack, but the target OS is
a zfs backed FreeBSD.
Which ML is the best place to ask? Here?
G
