Re: 13-stable NFS server hang

2024-02-29 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 4:04 PM Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:30 PM Garrett Wollman > wrote: > > > > Hi, all, > > > > We've had some complaints of NFS hanging at unpredictable intervals. > > Our NFS servers are running a 13-stable from last December, and > > tonight I sat in

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Peter
First off: the honorable Sir Edward, III. had the decency to have me ntified that they prefer to censor my messages (reasons were not given), I for my part consider it rather pointless to publicly ask questions, only to then inform those who bother to answer that one declines to receive their a

Re: service netif stop, instant reboot

2024-02-29 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I tried reproducing the behavior and had no luck at all. > I think it's the first time it's happened. Did it happen with a running WLAN ? I have similar issues if WLAN is active. > This seems like something where the stars might have to align to cause the > issue. > > This may be similar

Re: service netif stop, instant reboot

2024-02-29 Thread Chris
On 2024-02-29 08:17, henrichhart...@tuta.io wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the best list for this. I'm running an up-to-date 14.0-RELEASE. I ran `service netif stop` and my machine rebooted immediately. I haven't been able to find any logs or obvious errors. I tried reproducing the behavior

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Mark Millard
On Feb 29, 2024, at 09:40, Mark Millard wrote: > On Feb 29, 2024, at 08:21, Peter wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:02:42AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: >> ! Peter 'PMc' Much wrote on >> ! Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:40:05 UTC : >> ! >> ! > There is an updated patch in the PR 275594 (5 pieces

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Mark Millard
On Feb 29, 2024, at 08:21, Peter wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:02:42AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > ! Peter 'PMc' Much wrote on > ! Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:40:05 UTC : > ! > ! > There is an updated patch in the PR 275594 (5 pieces), that works for > ! > 13.3; I have it installed, and onl

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Peter
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 08:02:42AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: ! Peter 'PMc' Much wrote on ! Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:40:05 UTC : ! ! > There is an updated patch in the PR 275594 (5 pieces), that works for ! > 13.3; I have it installed, and only with that I am able to build gcc12 ! > - otherwise t

service netif stop, instant reboot

2024-02-29 Thread henrichhartzer
Hi, Not sure if this is the best list for this. I'm running an up-to-date 14.0-RELEASE. I ran `service netif stop` and my machine rebooted immediately. I haven't been able to find any logs or obvious errors. I tried reproducing the behavior and had no luck at all. I think it's the first time

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Mark Millard
[I grabbed locally modify text for one of those messages.] On Feb 29, 2024, at 08:02, Mark Millard wrote: > Peter 'PMc' Much wrote on > Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:40:05 UTC : > >> On 2024-02-27, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: >>> More recently looked and see top showing threads+system proces

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Mark Millard
Peter 'PMc' Much wrote on Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:40:05 UTC : > On 2024-02-27, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: > > More recently looked and see top showing threads+system processes > > shows I have one core getting 100% cpu for kernel{arc_prune} which has > > 21.2 hours over a 2 hour 23 min

Re: 13-STABLE high idprio load gives poor responsiveness and excessive CPU time per task

2024-02-29 Thread Peter 'PMc' Much
On 2024-02-27, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: >More recently looked and see top showing threads+system processes > shows I have one core getting 100% cpu for kernel{arc_prune} which has > 21.2 hours over a 2 hour 23 minute uptime. Ack. > I started looking to see if > https://www.freebs