On 12/29/23 21:20, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
On 12/29/23 18:00, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 29 Dec 2023, at 11:14, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
at least since 14-release, I can't compile base/ports with CPUTYPE post
nehalem. An
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 09:12:35PM +0100, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> On 12/29/23 18:00, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 29 Dec 2023, at 11:14, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > >
> > > at least since 14-release, I can't compile base/ports with CPUTYPE post
> > > nehalem. Any '-march' declaring AVX(*)
On 12/29/23 18:00, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 29 Dec 2023, at 11:14, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
at least since 14-release, I can't compile base/ports with CPUTYPE post
nehalem. Any '-march' declaring AVX(*) capability leads to SIGILLing binaries
with default -O2 CFLAGS.
..
If I compile with
On 29 Dec 2023, at 11:14, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>
> at least since 14-release, I can't compile base/ports with CPUTYPE post
> nehalem. Any '-march' declaring AVX(*) capability leads to SIGILLing
> binaries with default -O2 CFLAGS.
> Not much of a help, but here's a ports example, but same
Hello,
at least since 14-release, I can't compile base/ports with CPUTYPE post
nehalem. Any '-march' declaring AVX(*) capability leads to SIGILLing
binaries with default -O2 CFLAGS.
Not much of a help, but here's a ports example, but same result with
base outcome too:
zsh: illegal hardware
