Re: Is 14.0 to released based on 0 for sysctl vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled ?

On Nov 4, 2023, at 04:38, Mike Karels wrote: > On 4 Nov 2023, at 4:01, Ronald Klop wrote: > >> On 11/4/23 02:39, Mark Millard wrote: >>> It looks to me like releng/14.0 (as of 14.0-RC4) still has: >>> >>> int zfs_bclone_enabled; >>> SYSCTL_INT(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, bclone_enabled, CTLFLAG_RWTUN,

Re: Is 14.0 to released based on 0 for sysctl vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled ?

On 4 Nov 2023, at 4:01, Ronald Klop wrote: > On 11/4/23 02:39, Mark Millard wrote: >> It looks to me like releng/14.0 (as of 14.0-RC4) still has: >> >> int zfs_bclone_enabled; >> SYSCTL_INT(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, bclone_enabled, CTLFLAG_RWTUN, >> &zfs_bclone_enabled, 0, "Enable block cloning"); >> >>

Re: Is 14.0 to released based on 0 for sysctl vfs.zfs.bclone_enabled ?

On 11/4/23 02:39, Mark Millard wrote: It looks to me like releng/14.0 (as of 14.0-RC4) still has: int zfs_bclone_enabled; SYSCTL_INT(_vfs_zfs, OID_AUTO, bclone_enabled, CTLFLAG_RWTUN, &zfs_bclone_enabled, 0, "Enable block cloning"); leaving block cloning effectively disabled by default, no matt