It sounds like the vendor is handling NAT traversal on their side. They will be
assuming that Asterisk is behind NAT, because of the presence of private IP
addresses – particularly in the contact, and will be rewriting various parts.
They may be able to disable this for you – otherwise you’ll ne
Hi All,
I am configured kamailio to handle reg info event subscriptions, My server
is running if i configure the following parameter.
#kamailio local ip is 192.168.20.20
*modparam("pua_reginfo", "server_address", "sip:reginfo@192.168.20.20
")*
If i am not configured the above server address, i a
Handling NAT, perhaps, but not correctly. The RURI doesn't change. But not does
it have to determine where the request is actually sent on the network and
transport layers.
-- Alex
--
Principal, Evariste Systems LLC (www.evaristesys.com)
Sent from my Google Nexus.
__
Is it not just the case that the vendor does not support loose routing?
-Original Message-
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Alex
Balashov
Sent: 18 October 2016 08:40
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] BYE issue
Hand
Thank you, Daniel
I am trying to do this.
modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "$avp(i:123)=call_limit")
After auth:
This from mysql log:
2016-10-18T07:14:02.598195Z 4451 Queryselect
`password`,`call_limit` from `subscriber` where `username`='2000'
2016-10-18T07:14:02.599166Z 4451
Hello there,
I'm sending this email in order to know if anyone had work or has any idea
how we can generate Documentation from kamailio script using Comments?
This would be great because we could write comments explaining the Route
method during script development and use it to generate document
Hi Daniel,
Just curious, were you able to investigate on the error
message? I am still unable to get it working.
regards
Ganesh Kumar
On 10/14/16, Infinicalls Infinicalls wrote:
> Hi,
> I have pasted the entire log here for your ref.
>
> http://paste.fedoraproject.org/449906/14764350/
And I check. While kamailio process REGISTER request $avp(i:123) value
equals table column call_limit.
But after that while it process INVITE request $avp(i:123) is
вт, 18 окт. 2016 г. в 11:59, Ivan Dudko :
> Thank you, Daniel
> I am trying to do this.
> modparam("auth_db", "load_credentials", "
Thank you very much for your support,
When you say: "They may be able to disable this for you – otherwise you’ll
need to rewrite the headers yourself."
How can I rewrite the header if I dont have destination IP?, there are four
Asterisk servers and all of them send calls to the bridged Kamailio a
Hello, i need your help,
I'm having problems with the reverse response of an INVITE passing through a
rtpproxy (NAT). Does anyone have any idea what might be going on?
UE is informed of the result INVITE, but the UAS does not receive the test
bench detail.
Greetings.
--
Rodrigo M.
(37) 9132-4
Dear all,
I am trying to make a call between 2 webrtc clients(sipml5) using my
kamailio IMS setup. The invite request fails at the terminating PCSCF with
error code "Status: 478 Unresolvable destination (478/TM)". I have traced
the packages and saw that the package that arrives at the terminating
I am using kamailio with ubuntu, but I can't obtain CDRs.
In my conf. file related to CDR I have:
modparam("acc", "cdr_enable", 1)
modparam("acc", "cdr_start_on_confirmed", 1)
modparam("acc", "cdrs_table", "acc_cdrs")
modparam("acc", "cdr_start_id", "start_time")
modparam("acc", "cdr_end_id", "end
Hi folk!
Have a production server
- used as webrtc to sip proxy
- it is built on kamailio v 4.4.2
- Server handles connections from ~4000 incoming SIP trunks (transport=TLS).
Kamailio provides auth for this trunks.
- Kamailio receives also connections from Webrtc app. Calls from Webrtc
routed to on
13 matches
Mail list logo
