Hello Andres,
He looks like this:
alias=sip.domain.tld:5060
I also tried to add
Alias=:5060 and :4060
The only difference I seen in the debug is this line: > DEBUG:
[forward.c:448]: check_self(): check_self: host != me.
The line was not present if I set aliases with :4060. But the behaviour
loo
Hi .
I have installed Kamailio 4.1.6 and basic registration and proxy server
functionalities are working fine.
Now I want to simulate a Unconditional call forwarding scenario with
181-Call is being forwarded is reported to originator from server.
Thanks
___
Hi
I am using kamailio with rtp proxy module. I have 2 questions /issues .
1. When caller or callee ends the call the other end call is not
disocnnecting .
UA is pjsip based and behind NAT router. Present call flow is
pjsipUA (LAN_ip)->Router (Publicip)>Kamailio_with_RTP
proxy---
Something is going wrong here:
On 24.09.2014 18:41, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
> DEBUG: rr [loose.c:90]: is_preloaded(): is_preloaded: No
That's correct. The ACK is not pre-loaded (with a route set).
Checking first local URI (either alias= or listen= statement)
> DEBUG: [socket_info.c:583]: grep_s
Hello Klaus,
Thank you for the translation ;)
Here is the config:
/* add local domain aliases */
alias=sip.domain.tld
/* uncomment and configure the following line if you want Kamailio to
bind on a specific interface/port/proto (default bind on all available)
*/
listen=udp:IP_KAMAILIO/ASTERIS
I just identified that if "IP_KAMAILIO/ASTERISK" is set into domain table,
the issue occured.
If I delete this entry, the ACK is properly relayed.
The thing is that I use domain table for this check in REQ_INIT:
if (!has_totag()) {
if (!is_uri_host_local()) {
On 9/25/14, 9:17 AM, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
I just identified that if "IP_KAMAILIO/ASTERISK" is set into domain table,
As I said before, what you need to use is IP_KAMAILIO/ASTERISK:5060.
If you use it without the port, it will match also when directed to your
Asterisk server residing on the
i could not find any documentation about tm.t_uac_wait rpc command. is
it documented somewhere?
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman
Because I've more than 1 client behind NAT (1,2,3 mobile phones) and I would
like to reach all of them in parallel mode. I can't use for all of them same
ports because all mobile clients have early media (the receive video media
before they answer)
So at the moment this scenario is not possible
On Sep 25, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Marino Mileti wrote:
> Because I've more than 1 client behind NAT (1,2,3 mobile phones) and I would
> like to reach all of them in parallel mode. I can't use for all of them same
> ports because all mobile clients have early media (the receive video media
> befor
Hi kamailio users,
we are witnesses of new discovered bug in bash: Bash Code Injection
Vulnerability via Specially Crafted Environment Variables (CVE-2014-6271)
https://access.redhat.com/node/1200223
As exec module exports all SIP headers in environment so it's was easy to
push bash command.
Th
No no. The video will be sent by the caller user to all the callees.
I'l try to explain better. My scenario is:
- A make a call to a group... B & C are group member...so Kamailio is able
to call them in parallel using alias..
- B & C receive the INVITEs & replies with two separate 183 with SDP
sorry, I attached wrong patch in previous post
here is new with fixed body length comparison.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Seudin Kasumovic <
seudin.kasumo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi kamailio users,
>
> we are witnesses of new discovered bug in bash: Bash Code Injection
> Vulnerability via S
Hi Seudin,
thanks for heads up for vulnerabilities out there affecting us and the
patch!
One comment regarding the patch, I see this comparison:
if (!strncmp(w->u.hf->body.s,"() {",MIN(w->u.hf->body.len,2))) {
and I see as being compared of size 4 string. Missing something?
Cheers,
Daniel
OK, ignore my previous email then...
Thanks again,
Daniel
On 25/09/14 16:51, Seudin Kasumovic wrote:
sorry, I attached wrong patch in previous post
here is new with fixed body length comparison.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Seudin Kasumovic
mailto:seudin.kasumo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
You patch was pushed to master, 4.1 and 4.0 branches.
In addition, I pushed a patch with a new module parameter that could
disable the escape of the sensitive header part, just in case would be
needed by people who know what they do. Not documented in readme, as
probably should be removed rath
The rpc commands supposed to have documentation in the code, so you can do:
kamcmd help tm.t_uac_wait
There should be a char* array with doc strings when registering the
command in sources. But while not a really bad idea, it is not easy to
access and a bit odd place to add enhanced documenta
Yes you're right. But many SIP requests come with R-URI
sip: without the port.
So the test "is_from_local" fails.
Regards,
Igor.
-Message d'origine-
De : sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] De la part de Andres
Envoyé : jeudi 25 septembre
Hello,
Given the following scenario with Kamailio and rtpengine in the middle:
- call establishes with G.711 RTP
- b-leg re-invites to T.38, indicating a different port number then he is
using for G.711
- a-leg refuses the re-invite with a 488
- call continues using G.711 on original port num
On Sep 25, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Marino Mileti wrote:
>
> No no. The video will be sent by the caller user to all the callees.
>
> I'l try to explain better. My scenario is:
>
> - A make a call to a group... B & C are group member...so Kamailio is able to
> call them in parallel using alias..
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> The rpc commands supposed to have documentation in the code, so you
> can do:
>
> kamcmd help tm.t_uac_wait
i did figure that out, but help text is not comprehensive. for example,
it appears that host !! of contact uri in headers is replaced by ip
address of
Hello. I try to test with SIPp my stak of kamailio->asterisk. I run SIPp
with 200 calls/sec and see only 68 at maximum active calls at server. When
I set 500 calls/sec with limit 1000 I see 68 active connections again.
So when I try test SIPp to asterisk without Kam i see wright maximum of
active
Hello,
I installed kamailio and replaced kamailio.cfg with a customized
kamailio.cfg and replaced kamctlrc file also. And restarted the kamailio
server. Server gets started ok and after a minute or two, I get the error, "
'/usr/local/kamailio/sbin' doesnot belong to any package ". I am facing thi
based on more tests, it appears that tm.t_uac_wait does not use
advertise address (if given on listen line) when it substitutes !!
(SUBST_CHARs) in request headers.
i'll open a bug report on it.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSE
24 matches
Mail list logo
