Hello,
I am running a kamailio server with SIPS over TLS. Now I have to connect an
android based SIP client to server. The SIP client has no support for SIPS
over TLS. But it can run SIP over TLS. First I want to know the difference
between the two ??
Secondly how can I make my server accept SIP
On 05 May 2014, at 09:58, aawaise wrote:
> Hello,
> I am running a kamailio server with SIPS over TLS. Now I have to connect an
> android based SIP client to server. The SIP client has no support for SIPS
> over TLS. But it can run SIP over TLS. First I want to know the difference
> between the
I said this because my server is accepting connections with SIPS over TLS
settings on client. But not accepting connections with SIP over TLS.
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/SIP-over-TLS-tp127469p127471.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at N
Sir, uri scheme acceptable to my server is SIPS. I want it to accept
connection with uri scheme SIP. For that what changing is required in
kamailio server ?
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/SIP-over-TLS-tp127469p127472.html
Sent from the Users mailing lis
[first post to list]
Greetings,
I'm in the process of getting a Kamailio 3.3.2 installation authenticating
its SIP accounts against a RADIUS database. There are -- at the moment --
no plans to do any fancy accounting nor any authorisation beyond simple
authentication.
I've set up and tested a F
Hello,
shall we have our next irc devel meeting to discuss near future plans? I
am proposing Thursday, May 15, 2014, at 14:00UTC on #kamailio channel at
irc.freenode.net. If anyone wants a different date, please propose
alternatives and we will select the one suiting most of the participants.
Hello,
you should just use www_challenge() to send back the 401 response.
Here is a old tutorial, from the time when the project was named
openser, but could be a good reading anyhow:
- http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-radius-1.0.x.html
The authentication part is pretty much the same.
C
On 05 May 2014, at 12:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> shall we have our next irc devel meeting to discuss near future plans? I am
> proposing Thursday, May 15, 2014, at 14:00UTC on #kamailio channel at
> irc.freenode.net. If anyone wants a different date, please propose
> al
On 05/05/14 12:12, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
On 05 May 2014, at 12:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
shall we have our next irc devel meeting to discuss near future plans? I am
proposing Thursday, May 15, 2014, at 14:00UTC on #kamailio channel at
irc.freenode.net. If anyone wants a
Hi,
during simulating scenarios in relation with the notify problem I have so far, I
became unsure, if Kamilio (in principal) is supporting handling of PUBLISH
requests (event "dialog") that contain _more than_ one (1) dialog entry. I know
that it can generate notify requests with a message body t
Hello,
I haven't meet that case yet, but xml aggregation in presence_dialoginfo
seems to walk through all children of root note for each xml doc. Maybe
you can post here the output with debug=3.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 05/05/14 13:17, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:
Hi,
during simulating scenarios in re
Hello, can someone let me know the reason that the location table does not
get updated? Out of 15 extension only a few registered phones details get
updated in this table and the rest are not. But I can see all the extension
in Kamailio when I run kamctl ul show --brief.
Thank you,
Arun
__
On 05 May 2014, at 14:23, VOIP Tests wrote:
> Hello, can someone let me know the reason that the location table does not
> get updated? Out of 15 extension only a few registered phones details get
> updated in this table and the rest are not. But I can see all the extension
> in Kamailio when
Yes I am also getting this issue.
- Original Message -
From: VOIP Tests
To: Kamailio Mailing List
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 8:23 PM
Subject: [SR-Users] Location table not updated
Hello, can someone let me know the reason that the location table does not
get updated? Out o
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] n00b question -- RADIUS authentication. Date: Mon, May
05, 2014 at 12:09:54PM +0200 Quoting Daniel-Constantin Mierla
(mico...@gmail.com):
> Hello,
>
> you should just use www_challenge() to send back the 401 response.
>
> Here is a old tutorial, from the time when the pr
this is the output (in this example version 3.2.4) in debug level 3 after
receiving a PUBLISH request (incl. forming the NOTIFY request):
May 5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[23439]: DEBUG: presence
[event_list.c:350]: start event= [dialog/5]
May 5 16:21:49 sipsrvnode1 /usr/sbin/kamaili
Can you try with the latest version 4.1.x? It is where I looked in the
code and seemed to walk through all dialog nodes.
Cheers, Daniel
On 05/05/14 16:28, Klaus Feichtinger wrote:
this is the output (in this example version 3.2.4) in debug level 3
after receiving a PUBLISH request (incl. formi
there's also kamctl ul show.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 11:07 PM, aawaise wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have configured TLS on kamailio server. Problem is that in kamailio.cfg,
> when I use command port =5061. Kamailio doesnot start and error given in
> logs is
> >> ERROR: tcp_init : bind(a, 0x9007f4, 16) on MyIP:5061 : Adress already
I am working on enabling presence and bla in a Kamailio + FreeSWITCH
environment
All handsets are Polycom with a handful of Grandstream ATA's
I enabled presence and presence_xml
I have not got it to work as I keep seeing this meesage in the logs
NOTICE: presence [subscribe.c:1030]: handle_su
Hello:
after i starting kamailio for while, the system shows:
3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [mi_parser.c:84]: end of fifo input tree
3(1466) DEBUG: mi_fifo [fifo_fnc.c:507]: done parsing the mi tree
1(1464) DEBUG: usrloc [urecord.c:327]: Binding '102','
sip:102@192.168.1.105:5060' has expired
3(1466)
21 matches
Mail list logo
