Re: [SR-Users] kamailio with mediaproxy-ng, 488 Not Acceptable Here

2014-02-22 Thread Mihai Marin
Hello Sirs, Sir Richard, Thank you for your detailed explication. I'm still thinking on that but I would say to act as the caller and keep caller decision. If caller makes an offer with rtcp-mux , include separate ICE candidates for RTCP for media proxy too and forward as it is to alice. If callee

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio with mediaproxy-ng, 488 Not Acceptable Here

2014-02-22 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 02/22/14 07:07, Mihai Marin wrote: > Hello Sirs, Sir Richard, > Thank you for your detailed explication. > I'm still thinking on that but I would say to act as the caller and keep > caller decision. If caller makes an offer with rtcp-mux , > include separate ICE candidates for RTCP for media pro

Re: [SR-Users] Using Kamailio as a websocket LB

2014-02-22 Thread Luis Silva
Hi guys, Many thanks for the answers. I've also made a quick search and it seems HAProxy is the best tool for the job. Br, Luís On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jason Penton wrote: > Haproxy also very powerful for this > > --- > This mail was sent using my phone and may be brief, to the point,

[SR-Users] 500 Forking capacity exceeded (12/SL)

2014-02-22 Thread Juha Heinanen
Camila Troncoso writes: > If one gateway is full, busy, down or answers with any failed response to > LCR , I jump to the next gateway in the list. I´m presenting the problem > that its stops jumping after 12 gateways and returns the message 500 > Forking capacity exceeded (12/SL). I need to incr