[SR-Users] Modify Allow header

2013-07-08 Thread Mino Haluz
Hi, I need to modify Allow header that is sent from Freeswitch, to restrict it to only some very important ones. Do you think it really violates RFC ? :)) M ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-r

Re: [SR-Users] Modify Allow header

2013-07-08 Thread Alex Balashov
On 07/08/2013 05:32 AM, Mino Haluz wrote: I need to modify Allow header that is sent from Freeswitch, to restrict it to only some very important ones. Do you think it really violates RFC ? :)) Technically, yes. The field is populated by a UA, and the proxy has no business touching it. Prac

Re: [SR-Users] 'subst' request for message body (SDP)]

2013-07-08 Thread Klaus Feichtinger
Hi Klaus, Thx for your suggestion. The workaround is working fine with Pseudo-Variable $rb instead of $mb ("$var(sdp) = $(rb{s.striptail,2});") However, the broken body is generated by Kamailio with the filter_body() function. The server receives a multipart/mixed body and is filtering the SDP pa

[SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

2013-07-08 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi, we are building a setup where we use an rtpproxy in all cases. This works fine except for one scenario. Caller -> SIP(+rtpproxy) -> B2BUA -> SIP(+rtpproxy) -> Called In this case, the B2BUA implements forwarding and sends the call back through our setup. The B2BUA does not send out a 183 rep

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, iirc the flag, for the requests/replies coming from b2bua, use the 'r' as part of parameters to rtpproxy functions -- check the readme of the module. Cheers, Daniel On 7/8/13 1:52 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: Hi, we are building a setup where we use an rtpproxy in all cases. This work

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 07/08/13 01:52, Juha Heinanen wrote: i haven't tried it yet. just read what readme says: 4.7. ice_candidate_priority_avp (string) If specified and if value of the avp value is not 0, rtpproxy_manage function adds ICE relay candidate attributes to sdp stream(s) containing ICE candidate attr

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 7/8/13 2:03 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote: On 07/08/13 01:52, Juha Heinanen wrote: i haven't tried it yet. just read what readme says: 4.7. ice_candidate_priority_avp (string) If specified and if value of the avp value is not 0, rtpproxy_manage function adds ICE relay candidate attributes to s

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Juha Heinanen
Richard Fuchs writes: > If you want to use mediaproxy-ng with its ICE features, you'll have to > use it through the rtpproxy-ng module, which is currently available as > patch here: > https://github.com/sipwise/kamailio/blob/master/debian/patches/sipwise/rtproxy-ng.patch ok, i had missed that o

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

2013-07-08 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi Daniel, sorry, I probably didn't explain the problem correctly. The SIP part is okay, the ports on the rtpproxy are allocated, but bridging the audio doesn't work until both parties actually send at least one RTP packet. Since both streams (the inbound and the outbound call) end up at one of th

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 07/08/13 08:23, Juha Heinanen wrote: Richard Fuchs writes: If you want to use mediaproxy-ng with its ICE features, you'll have to use it through the rtpproxy-ng module, which is currently available as patch here: https://github.com/sipwise/kamailio/blob/master/debian/patches/sipwise/rtproxy-

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

2013-07-08 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Sebastian, I understood, the 'r' flag (iirc being the right one) tells to rtpproxy to trust the ip in sdp and send the rtp to it as soon as received from the other side. It is the same case as chaining many rtpproxies. Cheers, Daniel On 7/8/13 2:25 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote: Hi Daniel, s

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Juha Heinanen
Richard Fuchs writes: > I've been meaning to commit it to a private branch for review/comments > and eventual merging, but haven't gotten around to it yet. if the module compiles and works for you, i don't see any reason for not committing it straight to master branch. that way the threshold fo

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Juha Heinanen
i read readme of mediaproxy-ng module and don't find the rtpproxy module capability to tell priority of added ice attributes. also, i have hard time parsing this these sentences: + + - instructs the RTP proxy to discard any ICE attributes already present in the SDP body and

Re: [SR-Users] mediaproxy-ng documentation available

2013-07-08 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 07/08/13 09:12, Juha Heinanen wrote: i read readme of mediaproxy-ng module and don't find the rtpproxy module capability to tell priority of added ice attributes. also, i have hard time parsing this these sentences: + + - instructs the RTP proxy to discard any ICE attributes

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy issue in forwarding scenario

2013-07-08 Thread Sebastian Damm
Hi, sorry, I had a misunderstanding of how rtpproxy starts working. The r flag indeed fixed the problem. Thanks, Sebastian On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > I understood, the 'r' flag (iirc being the right one) tells to rtpproxy to trust the

[SR-Users] RTP proxy high CPU utilization...

2013-07-08 Thread arun Jayaprakash
Hello,  I have set up my Asterisk server with Kamailio where Kamailio handles the user authentication as per http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.1.x-asterisk-1.6.2-astdb. It is working well, I am able to make calls, two way sound, etc. The problem I am facing is that after maki