Re: [SR-Users] why use received as RURI for nathelper OPTIONS ping?

2013-03-08 Thread Juha Heinanen
Peter Dunkley writes: > * In configuration you must use add_path() even if you are a > single-server. add_path() works on lumps so this needs to be > applied before the registrar:save() function is called (I think > msg_apply_changes() should do this). would it be p

Re: [SR-Users] INVITE messages not authenticated (default configuration)?

2013-03-08 Thread Olle E. Johansson
7 mar 2013 kl. 23:20 skrev Paul Belanger : > Greeting, > > Hopefully, I'm understanding the following default kamailio.cfg[1] > file. Over the weekend, I was attached by SipVicious. Following > along with the example Daniel[2] create with kamailio and asterisk, I > have almost the same setup.

Re: [SR-Users] INVITE messages not authenticated (default configuration)?

2013-03-08 Thread Barry Flanagan
On 7 March 2013 22:20, Paul Belanger wrote: > Greeting, > > Hopefully, I'm understanding the following default kamailio.cfg[1] > file. Over the weekend, I was attached by SipVicious. Following > along with the example Daniel[2] create with kamailio and asterisk, I > have almost the same setup.

Re: [SR-Users] INVITE messages not authenticated (default configuration)?

2013-03-08 Thread Fred Posner
I think there's two ways of looking at this... 1) That Kamailio is sending all the calls to Asterisk. 2) That the Asterisk is sending the calls through I think the post Barry placed on Asterisk list identifies a serious issue; that being said the easy way one #1 to help avoid this, IMO,... A

Re: [SR-Users] why use received as RURI for nathelper OPTIONS ping?

2013-03-08 Thread Juha Heinanen
Peter Dunkley writes: > The biggest thing in the way of this right now is that the current > outbound on Kamailio does not contain everything it requires for > single-server proxy/registrar support. What is required is: > > * In configuration you must use add_path() even if you are a >