Hi,
2012/10/22 Vadim F. :
> Hi all,
>
> Could you please give a Kamailio's routing logic sample for python ?
> Thx
modules/app_python/handler.py [0]
But my advise is that if the task is not very simple, use lua.
My 2 cents.
[0]
http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=sip-router;a=blob
rtpproxy module readme gives impression that udp transport is the only
possibility:
4.1. rtpproxy_sock (string)
Definition of socket(s) used to connect to (a set) RTPProxy. It may
specify a UNIX socket or an IPv4/IPv6 UDP socket.
if that is the case, what is the justification for it, i.e, why is
On 10/19/12 9:40 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
But in this case the call is completed, because negative response codes
are absorbed by tm, 200ok being sent back, so no need to destroy any rtp
session. iirc, for all branches of a parallel fork there is one rtp
sessio
Hello,
you can commit, but add it also to force_rtp_proxy, where it should be
just ignored -- in this way rtpproxy_manage() can be used for all
requests and replies with same parameter.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/20/12 9:17 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
the patch below adds 't' flag to rtpproxy_destro
Hello,
have you set the config parameter for it?
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#auto_bind_ipv6
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/19/12 7:21 PM, Anton Kvashenkin wrote:
Hello guys.
In the Kamailio v.3.3.0 release notes
http://www.kamailio.org/w/kamailio-v3-3-0-release-notes/ it says:
Hello,
it seems you are having a version of ssl lib that does a free(null)
operation. It is fixed in master and 3.3 branch. Can you upgrade to 3.3.x?
Alternative is to compile 3.1.x with f_malloc -- edit Makefile.defs and
set MEMDBG=0
Or, backport patches from mem/ done last month -- you ca
Hi ,
i don't know how to realize this:
A --- INVITE>proxy INVITE> B
<--- 200 OK
---BYE>
---INVITE ->C
<--- 200 OK p
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> You can set a transaction flag when you force rtpproxy for a branch,
> then in onreply route, if you get a 200ok from a branch not involving
> rtp relay and that flag is set, then destroy the rtp relaying session.
that is exactly what i tried to do, but it req
This is impossible, by definition, with a proxy. That is because a
proxy is a proxy, not a back-to-back user agent (B2BUA), so it does not
create two different, logically independent call legs and bridge them.
Instead, one call leg A comes in, and that same call leg B goes out.
On 10/22/2012
Hi Juha,
On 10/22/2012 09:50 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Definition of socket(s) used to connect to (a set) RTPProxy. It may
> specify a UNIX socket or an IPv4/IPv6 UDP socket.
>
> if that is the case, what is the justification for it, i.e, why is tcp
> (and better yet tls) transport not supported
Andreas Granig writes:
> I fully agree that TCP (as a first step) should be a good improvement.
> We've already briefly talked about redesigning the overall rtpproxy
> control protocol some time ago, but we haven't had the time yet to start
> with it, however we've it on our list for December.
ok
lcr_gw table has:
ip_addr varchar(47)
trusted table has:
src_ip varchar(50)
address table has:
ip_addr varchar(48)
why is it that they are not all the same? also, why the common length
is not 8 * 4 + 7 = 39
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#Address_format)?
-- juha
__
Hi,
I am trying to get a company who handles our billing and account
provisioning connected to our Kamailio instance. I understand that XMLRPC
is likely the best method for doing this, but I am unable to find direct
commands equivalent to "kamctl add" or "kamctl rm". Is there a resource
that lists
Such things would most likely be done by database manipulations.
XMLRPC/MI are really for the manipulation of more low-level, technical
kinds of traits of the proxy process itself. Mostly.
On 10/22/2012 11:01 AM, Ed Brady wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get a company who handles our billing and a
Is there a tool available for this or will I need to devise something of my
own?
Thanks,
Ed
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Alex Balashov
wrote:
> Such things would most likely be done by database manipulations. XMLRPC/MI
> are really for the manipulation of more low-level, technical kinds
On 10/22/2012 11:06 AM, Ed Brady wrote:
Is there a tool available for this or will I need to devise something of
my own?
Well, that depends on how you're handling billing and account
management. :-) Kamailio provides some built-in modules for handling
some aspects of this, though non-trivi
This is connecting to a completely separate B/OSS that also handles this
sort of integration with our other SIP switch (different purpose and
software), and with our cellular admin interface. For all of these they
have used SOAP APIs as that is what has been available to interface with
the other sy
Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
regards
klaus
On 17.10.2012 20:18, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:
uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas
-> cancel -> proxy -> canc
On 10/22/12 4:11 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
lcr_gw table has:
ip_addr varchar(47)
trusted table has:
src_ip varchar(50)
address table has:
ip_addr varchar(48)
why is it that they are not all the same? also, why the common length
is not 8 * 4 + 7 = 39
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6#Addr
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> For safety, i would use 48, to allow zero termination
why 48 when max length of ipv6 addr is 39 chars? did you mean 40?
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@li
On 10/22/12 13:59, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> For safety, i would use 48, to allow zero termination
>
> why 48 when max length of ipv6 addr is 39 chars? did you mean 40?
If you use 4-in-6 mapped format, omit zeroes compression and add square
brackets, you get 4
22 okt 2012 kl. 19:59 skrev Juha Heinanen :
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> For safety, i would use 48, to allow zero termination
>
> why 48 when max length of ipv6 addr is 39 chars? did you mean 40?
It's hard to judge the max length of IPv6, since there are many notations. With
IPv4
On 10/22/12 7:59 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
For safety, i would use 48, to allow zero termination
why 48 when max length of ipv6 addr is 39 chars? did you mean 40?
text representation can use ipv4 format for last 4 bytes:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#pa
I'm setting up Homer with kamailio for sip capturing. I've got it all
set up and am getting this error. I have one interface for packet
capture on a mirroired port and one interface for managment. I'm
thinking that I have to only have kamailio listen on the packet capture
interface and not the
Richard Fuchs writes:
> If you use 4-in-6 mapped format, omit zeroes compression and add square
> brackets, you get 47 characters:
>
> [::::::123.123.123.123]
why would someone use such a format when there is canonical format
specified in http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc595
On 10/22/12 14:14, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Richard Fuchs writes:
>
>> If you use 4-in-6 mapped format, omit zeroes compression and add square
>> brackets, you get 47 characters:
>>
>> [::::::123.123.123.123]
>
> why would someone use such a format when there is canonical fo
Olle E. Johansson writes:
> It's hard to judge the max length of IPv6, since there are many
> notations. With IPv4 embedded IPv6 the text is expanded. With scoped
> addresses where the interface name is added, it grows again.
ipv6 is even bigger mesh than what i ever thought.
as i wrote, there i
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> Then add 3 for the square brackets and the ending 0.
where are square brackets specifies? there is nothing about them in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER
Hello,
that message is printed by the mechanism that tries to discover local
hostnames to add them to aliases list.
To turn that off, use '-a no' in command line or 'auto_aliases=no' in
configuration file.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/22/12 8:11 PM, Christopher Holland wrote:
I'm setting up Homer
On 10/22/12 8:23 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Then add 3 for the square brackets and the ending 0.
where are square brackets specifies? there is nothing about them in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291.
I gave the link to show the ipv4 representation. Square brac
On 10/22/12 14:19, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> to me it makes sense to store addresses only in canonical format to
> database in order to make sure that address comparison can be made
> uniquely.
Using the string representation of an address for anything other than to
provide a human readable version
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> I gave the link to show the ipv4 representation. Square brackets are
> commonly used in ipv6 representations, specially in url/uri -- wikipedia
> link you provided mentions that..
yes, but when they are used in url, square brackets are not part of the
address.
On 10/22/12 8:19 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Olle E. Johansson writes:
It's hard to judge the max length of IPv6, since there are many
notations. With IPv4 embedded IPv6 the text is expanded. With scoped
addresses where the interface name is added, it grows again.
ipv6 is even bigger mesh than w
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> text representation can use ipv4 format for last 4 bytes:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4291#page-4
>
> common for cases when tunneling ipv4 over ipv6.
>
> That is:
>
> (6 * 4 + 5) + 1 + (4 * 3 + 3) = 45
>
> Then add 3 for the square brackets and th
On 10/22/12 8:36 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
I gave the link to show the ipv4 representation. Square brackets are
commonly used in ipv6 representations, specially in url/uri -- wikipedia
link you provided mentions that..
yes, but when they are used in url, square
22 okt 2012 kl. 20:24 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
> that message is printed by the mechanism that tries to discover local
> hostnames to add them to aliases list.
>
> To turn that off, use '-a no' in command line or 'auto_aliases=no' in
> configuration file.
Which is a command
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> many times the management system sits between chair and keyboard :-) ,
> being able to read/add human representation is really crucial in this
> case.
leaving out square brackets, which are not specified in ipv6 address
rfc, should not be an overwhelming task f
22 okt 2012 kl. 20:24 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla :
> Hello,
>
> that message is printed by the mechanism that tries to discover local
> hostnames to add them to aliases list.
>
> To turn that off, use '-a no' in command line or 'auto_aliases=no' in
> configuration file.
http://www.kamaili
On 10/22/12 9:01 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
many times the management system sits between chair and keyboard :-) ,
being able to read/add human representation is really crucial in this
case.
leaving out square brackets, which are not specified in ipv6 address
rfc
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> I am not sure anymore the reason of the debate here. Saving two optional
> bytes which are not allocated if not used in a db varchar field?
it started because there is three different lengths of ip address field
in three different tables, which does not make an
I have this all working now. I had previously configured this as a gateway
and once issues were fixed on our vendor's end, it worked. Is there a
disadvantage to using this method rather than the permissions module?
On a related note (though maybe not related enough), when we get responses
from the
Hello All,
I am hoping the authors of the RLS/PUA modules can answer this
question since I am not sure what's going on. I have the rls module
enabled, with the following config spec:
# --rls module params --
modparam("rls", "db_url", DBURL)
modparam("rls", "db_mode", 2)
modparam("rls",
getting this error:
kamailio: ERROR: [modparam.c:151]: set_mod_param_regex: parameter
not found in module
parse error in config file /usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line
63, column 46: Can't set module parameter
I have set this to modparam("siptrace", "trace_to_database", "0") in my
Hi,
On 10/22/2012 07:04 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
It's actually about serial hunting e.g. on ring-timeout (maybe the term
"forking" is ambiguous).
Consider this scenario:
A sends INVITE to proxy, which calls rtpproxy_offer to create a new
To be a bit more clear: the server_address has the ip of the kamailio
server. Not sure if that's correct. Also not sure what the pua
default_domain is supposed to be set to: right now it's the server's
ip.
Sangeeta
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Sangeeta Shah wrote:
> Hello All,
>I am ho
Sangeeta Shah writes:
> Only error I see in the syslog:
> Oct 22 15:22:22 RCS-Presence /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[11745]: ERROR:
> db_mysql [km_dbase.c:122]: driver error on query: Duplicate entry
> '1350937406' for key 'expires_idx'
if this comes from pua table, check that the index has been defin
46 matches
Mail list logo
