Hi,
Occasionally I can see the following log output from Kamailio in our systems:
WARNING: [local_timer.c:97]: WARNING: local_timer: add_timeout: 0 expire
timer added
Can someone explain what it means?
Many thanks.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Marco Barthel
Robert Bosch GmbH
(CI
The description is implicit: "AVPs are special variables that are
attached to SIP transactions." As a spiral causes 2 transactions there
are two different contexts for AVPs.
Feel free to improve/extend the description.
regards
Klaus
On 07.08.2012 21:49, Brandon Armstead wrote:
Klaus,
I
Thanks for the hint. What is the file name in /etc/modprob.d/ where i am
supposed to enter this module name to disable it.
Thanks
Vijay Tha
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:01:03 -0400
From: Richard Fuchs
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kernel Droping SIP packet
To:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Me
Dears,
Am trying to apply Kamailio LCR feature lab test, after am finally able to
run Kamailio with no errors, am not able to reach my target clarified in
this following scenario:
Call 961312345 - route the call to 192.x.x.15 in first place and if failed
route the call to 192.x.x.10. I applied
echo "blacklist nf_conntrack_sip" >> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf
2012/8/8 Vijay Thakur
> Thanks for the hint. What is the file name in /etc/modprob.d/ where i am
> supposed to enter this module name to disable it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Vijay Tha
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:01:03 -0
Hi All,
I'm running redundant kamailio 3.0.4 servers in production, have been
for a long time with great success. They were installed on debian
Lenny. One of my servers crashed. I can't seem to do a debian lennyy
install because that version is archived now. I'm trying to install
on debian sque
When you restart the service, does it say "using dependency-based boot
sequencing", or just restart? In other words, does 'squeeze' use
dependency-based boot sequencing? I don't remember.
If it does, read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DependencyBasedBoot
On 08/08/2012 01:13 PM
Or, perhaps more to the point:
http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/
Another option, if you're feeling lazy, don't care about LSB crap, and
just want to solve your problem right now, is to just start Kamailio
manually in /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh. That gets fired up after all the
LSB init scr
Attachment here!
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Fatima
Chahrour~Vanrise Support
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:32 PM
To: 'SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List'
Subject: [SR-
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm running redundant kamailio 3.0.4 servers in production, have been
> for a long time with great success. They were installed on debian
> Lenny. One of my servers crashed. I can't seem to do a debian lennyy
> install because t
On 08/08/2012 01:34 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
The old init scrip that ships with Kamailio 3.0.4 that I am using is
not 100% compatible so I pulled a hack out of the hat and inserted
'sleep 20' before of 'check_fork ()' in the kamailio init script.
Kamailio now waits long enough for all services
Hi.
Another solution is to change priority in /etc/rc2.d/
I think it's more correct, because if you change kamailio ini script -
after update you will need to change /etc/init.d/kamailio script manually
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 01:34 PM, JR Richardson w
Not in dependency-based boot sequencing. :-)
On 08/08/2012 01:49 PM, Pavel Klochan wrote:
Hi.
Another solution is to change priority in /etc/rc2.d/
I think it's more correct, because if you change kamailio ini script -
after update you will need to change /etc/init.d/kamailio script manually
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:34 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:13 PM, JR Richardson
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm running redundant kamailio 3.0.4 servers in production, have been
>> for a long time with great success. They were installed on debian
>> Lenny. One of my servers
I am running Centos v5.5 and both openssl versions 0.9 and 1.0 are
installed. I tried to uninstall version 0.9 but there were over 400
packages that were dependent upon that version.
Thanks
Nathaniel
On 8/3/2012 3:51 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 8/3/12 5:42 AM, Nathaniel L
15 matches
Mail list logo
