Re: [SR-Users] Cancel rtp proxy changes to SDP

David, On 07/01/2010 09:19 PM, David wrote: Hello, I have setup an application level gateway that bridges my two networks. I have a situation where an INVITE will cross the gateway ( thus rewriting the SDP ) go through a proxy and come back across the gateway. At this point, it would be waste

Re: [SR-Users] UAC, parsing auth header failed

On 07/02/2010 02:54 AM, Ján ONDREJ (SAL) wrote: My target is checking for their domain in From: header. Can I use some transactional rewrite, which can automatically rewrite this change back? I tryed to use t_on_reply without success yet. It is not something a proxy is supposed to be able to d

Re: [SR-Users] UAC, parsing auth header failed

On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:05:40AM -0400, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 07/02/2010 02:54 AM, Ján ONDREJ (SAL) wrote: > > >My target is checking for their domain in From: header. Can I use some > >transactional rewrite, which can automatically rewrite this change back? > >I tryed to use t_on_reply with

Re: [SR-Users] UAC, parsing auth header failed

On 07/02/2010 03:22 AM, "Ján ONDREJ (SAL)" wrote: I use defaults, so looks like I use automatic restore. I don't know, how to send it manually, so auto looks to be a good choice. uac_restore_from can't be used from reply route. If you are using the "auto" restore mode, it is not necessary to c

[SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

hello, I use kamailio 1.5.4 with rtpproxy 1.2.1 I try to change the ptime (RTP packet size) with the Nathelper module . to do it I call the function rtpproxy_offer with the option "z20" but the "a=ptime:30" in SDP is not changed any idea ? Regards Laurent Log of RT

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 62, Issue 9

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, leider kann ich Ihre e-mail momentan nicht beantworten / bearbeiten, da ich mich bis einschliesslich 19.07.2010 im Urlaub befinde. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte telefonisch an meine Mitarbeiter unter der Rufnummer 04231 / 776 . Mit freundlichen

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

On 07/02/2010 04:15 AM, Laurent Schweizer wrote: hello, I use kamailio 1.5.4 with rtpproxy 1.2.1 I try to change the ptime (RTP packet size) with the Nathelper module . to do it I call the function rtpproxy_offer with the option "z20" but the "a=ptime:30" in SDP is not changed Try use force_

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you need manually to alter the SDP (at least for 1.5.x). Tha NAT-Helper module will not do this for you. Please see the Textops-Module on how to do this. Carsten 2010/7/2 Laurent Schweizer > hello, > > > > I use kamailio 1.5.4 with rtpproxy 1.2.1

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

On 07/02/2010 04:22 AM, Carsten Bock wrote: In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you need manually to alter the SDP (at least for 1.5.x). Tha NAT-Helper module will not do this for you. Please see the Textops-Module on how to do this. So, the 'z' option to force_rtp_proxy() will only r

Re: [SR-Users] One way audio on calls from pstn

Solved. in asterisk<->kamailio trunk config placed nat=yes canreinvite=no Thank you for cooperation, Dmitri 02.07.2010 0:51, dotnetdub пишет: On 1 July 2010 22:41, Dmitri Korotkov > wrote: Hi, voice:/# ps auxf |grep rtpproxy |grep -v grep rt

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

Correct. Maybe we could add this later, but for now, this is correct. Carsten 2010/7/2 Alex Balashov > On 07/02/2010 04:22 AM, Carsten Bock wrote: > > In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you need manually to alter >> the SDP (at least for 1.5.x). Tha NAT-Helper module will not do this

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 62, Issue 10

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, leider kann ich Ihre e-mail momentan nicht beantworten / bearbeiten, da ich mich bis einschliesslich 19.07.2010 im Urlaub befinde. In dringenden Fällen wenden Sie sich bitte telefonisch an meine Mitarbeiter unter der Rufnummer 04231 / 776 . Mit freundlichen

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

On 07/02/2010 04:27 AM, Carsten Bock wrote: Correct. Maybe we could add this later, but for now, this is correct. I see. Well, this should probably be made clear in the documentation. I do not think it is unreasonable for someone to think that force_rtp_proxy("...zNN") performs necessary S

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 62, Issue 10

Does anyone know a way how to block a subscribed user to send messages with mailman, other than unsubscribing? There is the option of nomail (not sending emails), but I am looking for something that will get his/her email in bounces, so that such auto-replies are filtered. Thanks, Daniel O

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

Thanks for the info. Regards Laurent De : Carsten Bock [mailto:li...@bock.info] Envoyé : vendredi 2 juillet 2010 10:23 À : Laurent Schweizer Cc : sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Objet : Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size In order to change the attribute in the SDP, you nee

Re: [SR-Users] permissions module address_reload not working

On Jul 01, 2010 at 13:38, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > > > Juha, I just committed on master and tested over MI where works fine. > > Can you do some tests over rpc? If all ok then can be backported. > > it would be nice if i could, but after trying to cherry-pick my

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP SERVER MODULE

Hello, please address the questions to public mailing lists (e.g., sr-users@lists.sip-router.org), emails sent to private address only may not be answered at all or replied after long time. There are many people on ML that can answer faster and better. On 6/17/10 5:11 PM, michael ayoola wrot

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 62, Issue 10

On Friday 02 July 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Does anyone know a way how to block a subscribed user to send messages > with mailman, other than unsubscribing? > > There is the option of nomail (not sending emails), but I am looking for > something that will get his/her email in bounces

Re: [SR-Users] Missing ACK

Am 01.07.2010 22:33, schrieb Ole Kaas: Hello, The guy operating the Asterisk at the far end have been inspecting the traces I've sent him. Hen notes that the ACK relayed doesn't entirely comply to the standard. The values of "branch" in the VIA header of the relayed ACK response incorrectly

Re: [SR-Users] Missing ACK

Am 01.07.2010 17:40, schrieb Claudio Furrer: Am 01.07.2010 14:38, schrieb Claudio Furrer: Hi, I have a similar issue, It is not possible to debug this issue without full SIP trace! ngrep -Wbyline -t -d any port 5060 I find it unpleasant to read such a trace. Please really use ngrep to g

Re: [SR-Users] change ptime / RTP packet size

On Friday 02 July 2010, Alex Balashov wrote: > [..] > I suppose it is kind of silly for me to say; I have commit privileges > for documentation, I should fix it myself. :-) Problem is I forget > how to use git, since I never do. Hi Alex, ok, if you send me a patch, or add it to the tracker i'l

Re: [SR-Users] Missing ACK

Am 02.07.2010 15:54, schrieb Claudio Furrer: Hi, I have a similar issue, It is not possible to debug this issue without full SIP trace! ngrep -Wbyline -t -d any port 5060 I find it unpleasant to read such a trace. Please really use ngrep to get a nice formated SIP trace, or supply the pcap

Re: [SR-Users] Missing ACK

> > > > > > Hi, I have a similar issue, > > > > > > > > > > It is not possible to debug this issue without full SIP trace! > > > > > > > > > > ngrep -Wbyline -t -d any port 5060 > > > > > > I find it unpleasant to read such a trace. Please really use ngrep to get > > > a > > > nice formated SIP

Re: [SR-Users] Missing ACK

If you allways route the requests from the broken caller to the other gateway, you can use something like that: ... if (loose_route() { if (src__ip=10.10.10.128) { $rd=10.20.20.153; $du="sip:10.20.20.153:5060"; } ... normal loose-route processing t_relay(); exit; } ... regar