On Monday 14 June 2010, Steven C. Blair wrote:
> I’m migrating from an older version of SER to sip-router. A syntax check
> of my config file produces a few errors. The most confusing is :
>
> 0(27980) WARNING: [cfg.y:3364]: warning in config file
> /home/blairs/ser-penn.cfg, line 1270, column
On Jun 14, 2010 at 13:29, Steven C. Blair wrote:
>
> I'm migrating from an older version of SER to sip-router. A syntax check of
> my config file produces a few errors. The most confusing is :
>
> 0(27980) WARNING: [cfg.y:3364]: warning in config file
> /home/blairs/ser-penn.cfg, line 1270,
->
Am 15.06.2010 12:53, schrieb Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul:
On Jun 14, 2010 at 13:29, Steven C. Blair wrote:
I'm migrating from an older version of SER to sip-router. A syntax check of
my config file produces a few errors. The most confusing is :
0(27980) WARNING: [cfg.y:3364]: w
Hi there,
I am pretty new to all this (kamailio..)
I am trying to set up the following:
1. Kamailio with web-gui -> done
2. Asterisk / elastix for connecting to sip-provider / PSTN-> done
This works perfectly incoming / outgoing
3. Connecting elastix/asterix to kamailio -
On Jun 15, 2010 at 14:43, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> > ->
>
>
>
> Am 15.06.2010 12:53, schrieb Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul:
> >On Jun 14, 2010 at 13:29, Steven C. Blair wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm migrating from an older version of SER to sip-router. A syntax check
> >> of my config file produces a fe
2010/6/15 Klaus Darilion :
> What about IPv6 addresses?
IPv6 addresses must me converted to in6_addr struct prior to match
them, as there can be different representations for the same IPv6
address.
For example, take a look to this code:
/**
* Convert an IPv6 address as hexadecimal without ":"
Hi All,
I have been in the lab testing various load balancing scenarios with
kamailio 1.5 and 3.0 and distributing calls to asterisk servers. I am
running into an issue that I'm sure is related to sipp not kamailio or
asterisk. My testing is setup like this:
sipp> 10.10.14.97:5061
SIP/2.0 200 OK
1) AFAIK, the Record-Route/Route headers are used by TM for maintaining
transaction state, unless you are relying on the 'dialog' module's "fast
matching" cookies, which are identifiers that get placed as a URI
parameter into the Record-Route header so that it is not necessary to
match the mess
On 06/15/2010 04:57 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
* are NOT used.
1) AFAIK, the Record-Route/Route headers are used by TM for maintaining
transaction state, unless you are relying on the 'dialog' module's "fast
matching" cookies, which are identifi
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:44 PM, JR Richardson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been in the lab testing various load balancing scenarios with
> kamailio 1.5 and 3.0 and distributing calls to asterisk servers. I am
> running into an issue that I'm sure is related to sipp not kamailio or
> asterisk. My
Greetings,
When I use uac_auth() in a failure route in this manner:
if(t_check_status("407")) {
uac_auth();
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
or the reverse order vis-a-vis uac_auth() and append_branch(), I do not
see any digest authentication headers being inserted into
11 matches
Mail list logo
