On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:23:46PM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> can you try to change the module exports for uac module and allow
> uac_auth() for REQUEST_ROUTE or BRANCH_FAILURE_ROUTE (not sure right now
> by heart which one is required) and see if it actually works. Then the
> flags c
Hello,
can you try to change the module exports for uac module and allow
uac_auth() for REQUEST_ROUTE or BRANCH_FAILURE_ROUTE (not sure right now
by heart which one is required) and see if it actually works. Then the
flags can be extended if all ok.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 29/08/16 11:22, Daniel Tryba
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 01:58:57PM +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> try to see if it works to do the authentication in the branch failure
> event route. There you can do processing as soon as the 401 arrives --
> it has to be tried to see if uac auth works fine there, if not probably
> need
Hello,
try to see if it works to do the authentication in the branch failure
event route. There you can do processing as soon as the 401 arrives --
it has to be tried to see if uac auth works fine there, if not probably
needs some tuning.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 25/08/16 15:42, Daniel Tryba wrote:
>
Hello,
there is a limitation of uac_auth() mentioned in the readme of uac
module. Perhaps asterisk doesn't accept the follow up request with
credentials having the same cseq value.
You should just configure asterisk to allow traffic from kamailio based
on ip address, without username/passwor
On 06/16/2010 04:56 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
do you get any error message? The only case when is printed a dbg
message is when no credentials for the realm in challenge are found.
Test to see if uac_auth() returns false or true.
There was a realm mismatch; I corrected this and Prox
2010/6/16 Alex Balashov :
> Am I misreading 3261 Section 22.3?
>
>
> If a proxy were to resubmit a request adding a
> Proxy-Authorization header field value, it would need
> to increment the CSeq in the new request. However, this
> would cause the UAC that submitted the origin
On 6/16/10 10:32 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 06/16/2010 04:27 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/6/16 Alex Balashov:
Also, CSeq is not being incremented.
Why do you want CSeq being incremented by the proxy? Note that the UAS
still knows nothing about the request until it receives the firs
On 06/16/2010 04:27 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/6/16 Alex Balashov:
Also, CSeq is not being incremented.
Why do you want CSeq being incremented by the proxy? Note that the UAS
still knows nothing about the request until it receives the first
INVITE (with credentials) from he proxy.
2010/6/16 Alex Balashov :
> Also, CSeq is not being incremented.
Why do you want CSeq being incremented by the proxy? Note that the UAS
still knows nothing about the request until it receives the first
INVITE (with credentials) from he proxy.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
10 matches
Mail list logo
