I've now verified that berkeley db creation works in the 3.1 branch. Good
work!
/noa
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
> On 12/29/10 6:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM,
On 12/29/10 6:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Ju
On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>>
>> Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and 'lcr' be
>>> removed?
>>>
>> yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses the
On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and 'lcr' be
removed?
yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses these three tables: lcr_gw, lcr_rule,
lcr_rule_target.
ok, done, cherry-picked in 3.1 for dbtext and db_berkele
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and 'lcr' be
> removed?
yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses these three tables: lcr_gw, lcr_rule,
lcr_rule_target.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (Open
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> I tried with dbtext and the lcr tables are created ok.
>
> Noa, what specific version are you using? Seems to be installed from
> packages, right? Which distro? Then the problem might be in the packaging
> specs. I did it from so
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 12/26/10 1:46 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
>
>> Hello Friends,
>>
>> I thought I'd set up a SIP server during the holidays and kamailio seemed
>> like a good choice. Since my setup won't be handling l
On 12/27/10 1:40 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 12/27/10 11:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
the LCR module got refurbished and changed completely the database
structure, but the scripts to create the tables for db_text and
db_berkeley engines seem to be
On 12/27/10 11:52 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
the LCR module got refurbished and changed completely the database
structure, but the scripts to create the tables for db_text and
db_berkeley engines seem to be not maintained in this case.
yes, unless they can be g
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
> the LCR module got refurbished and changed completely the database
> structure, but the scripts to create the tables for db_text and
> db_berkeley engines seem to be not maintained in this case.
yes, unless they can be generated automatically from the schema f
Hello,
On 12/26/10 1:46 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
Hello Friends,
I thought I'd set up a SIP server during the holidays and kamailio
seemed like a good choice. Since my setup won't be handling large
amounts of users, a file based backend seemed like a good choice.
Since I didn't find any "new use
12 matches
Mail list logo
