Re: [SR-Users] sip_trace vs uac_reg

2016-02-22 Thread Alex Balashov
On 02/22/2016 02:28 PM, Armen Babikyan wrote: If your process is also acting as a SIP proxy, you may wish to consider preloading route headers into the UAC-generated message and sending the packets to the proxy port (where they would go through request_route as any other proxied request, and via

Re: [SR-Users] sip_trace vs uac_reg

2016-02-22 Thread Armen Babikyan
If your process is also acting as a SIP proxy, you may wish to consider preloading route headers into the UAC-generated message and sending the packets to the proxy port (where they would go through request_route as any other proxied request, and via onreply/failure routes for responses). It does

Re: [SR-Users] sip_trace vs uac_reg

2016-02-20 Thread Alex Balashov
James, I'm not sure there's any way to intercept endogenously generated specialty requests (like uac_reg requests) in route script. If there is, it would only be in something relatively low-level like the onsend_route. uacreg may use TM callbacks internally to catch responses, but that doesn