Re: [SR-Users] service uri not found in rls-services document

2013-05-03 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > if it was something that was not working as it should, go ahead and > backport if you tested the patch. i tested it with xcap documents generated by sipclients, which should be available also for macosx if you need access to rls capable sip client. -- juha __

Re: [SR-Users] service uri not found in rls-services document

2013-05-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if it was something that was not working as it should, go ahead and backport if you tested the patch. Cheers, Daniel On 5/3/13 7:01 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Juha Heinanen writes: it clearly shows that the reason for not finding the uri are the escaped chars in xcap rls-services doc.

Re: [SR-Users] service uri not found in rls-services document

2013-05-02 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > If you find an issue that you cannot solve, fire a report on the bug > tracker. It will be picked up by a developer at some point in spare > time, if you are under pressure, you can get to other solutions like > finding software consultant to do it for you, it

Re: [SR-Users] service uri not found in rls-services document

2013-05-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/2/13 7:16 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: looks like kamailio presence and especially rls is lagging behind in development ... You statement is simply misinforming and creates confusion without a real foundation ... with a minimum effort you could have spotted a large amount of development that

Re: [SR-Users] service uri not found in rls-services document

2013-05-02 Thread Peter Dunkley
Last I looked (around February) there were some things in Kamailio presence that aren't in OpenSIPS. For example, the separate notifier processes in both presence and rls (I believe one may have been ported across now by Saul - but not both). There are also extensions relating to the built-in XCA