Thanks, now I remember again :-)
Please copy the whole description into the rtpproxy README.
Thanks
Klaus
On 22.10.2012 22:46, Andreas Granig wrote:
Hi,
On 10/22/2012 07:04 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
It's actually about serial hunting e.
Hi,
On 10/22/2012 07:04 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
> Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
It's actually about serial hunting e.g. on ring-timeout (maybe the term
"forking" is ambiguous).
Consider this scenario:
A sends INVITE to proxy, which calls rtpproxy_offer to create a new
Please ask Andreas about those flags - he commited it
regards
klaus
On 17.10.2012 20:18, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Juha Heinanen writes:
is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:
uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas
-> cancel -> proxy -> canc
Juha Heinanen writes:
> is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:
>
> uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas
> -> cancel -> proxy -> cancel -> first uas
> -> invite -> second uas
>
> where second proxy i
Klaus Darilion writes:
> Maybe the description is bad/wrong, but the details are described in
> this thread:
>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-February/071943.html
klaus,
that description there is not very clear either:
I ran into a scenario with couple of serial forks
That's a very unclear/ambiguous description for those flags ...
-ovidiu
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Klaus Darilion
wrote:
> Hi Juha!
>
> Maybe the description is bad/wrong, but the details are described in this
> thread:
>
> http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-February/07194
Hi Juha!
Maybe the description is bad/wrong, but the details are described in
this thread:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/2012-February/071943.html
regards
Klaus
On 17.10.2012 18:47, Juha Heinanen wrote:
i'm new to rtpproxy (have been using mediaproxy for years) and now try
