Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-06-14 Thread Dmitry
Hi when I try to remove these extra SDP line I insert the following code to the script:in INTERNAL_REPLY onreply_route if($T_reply_code=="200")        {             if(has_body("application/sdp"))            {xlog("L_INFO", "RTPENGINE received internal reply $T_reply_code $rr SD

Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-06-10 Thread Dmitry
When I make internal call between 2 internal subscribers (yate softphones). The subscriber B answeres, after all the Kamailio/rtpengine sends a 200ok  reply to the subscriber A, but the softphone does not recognize it (it does not ACK it). I think it is because of its SDP which the RTPENGINE rep

Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-05-07 Thread Dmitry
[SR-Users] question about RTPengine Does it mean that rtpengine_manage() determine the session state itself? i.e it is not needed to find out in the configuration file that INVITE contains SDP or not because rtpengine_manage() determins internally what this INVITE is? am I correct? On Fr

Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-05-06 Thread Alex Balashov
‎It's just a description of stateful behaviour in relation to the SDP offer-answer cycle. ‎ -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristes

Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

2016-05-06 Thread Richard Fuchs
On 05/06/2016 07:36 AM, Dmitry wrote: > hello > > i read the documentation about RTPengine. > and the documentation says that: > > If INVITE with SDP, when the tm module is loaded, mark transaction with > internal flag FL_SDP_BODY to know that the 1xx and 2xx are for > rtpengine_answer() > > wh