Re: [SR-Users] question about NAT being behind of a Load Balancer

2012-02-03 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi Albert! On 03.02.2012 11:24, Albert Petit wrote: Hi Klaus, Thanks for your answer! 2012/2/3 Klaus Darilion mailto:klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>> The Load-Balancer is the only server which sees the real IP Address of the client. Thus, some parts of NAT-Traversal can only be done by

Re: [SR-Users] question about NAT being behind of a Load Balancer

2012-02-03 Thread Albert Petit
Hi Klaus, Thanks for your answer! 2012/2/3 Klaus Darilion > The Load-Balancer is the only server which sees the real IP Address of the > client. Thus, some parts of NAT-Traversal can only be done by the LB. > Expecting kind of this answer because also makes sense to me that LB is the only one

Re: [SR-Users] question about NAT being behind of a Load Balancer

2012-02-03 Thread Klaus Darilion
The Load-Balancer is the only server which sees the real IP Address of the client. Thus, some parts of NAT-Traversal can only be done by the LB. E.g. the LB must use force_rport() and mangle the contact header of the client. Further, if you use light-weight NAT-keep-alive (CR-LF) you have to d