Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-07-08 Thread Anton Roman
Hi, sorry for my late reply. I hardcoded the Contact header in dialog/dlg_transfer.c file. It is not a very elegant way, but I had a short time to fix it :-) Attached you can find a diff output with the changes I made. Besides the Contact, I had to add more headers for compatibility reasons both

Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-07-01 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/27/10 3:32 PM, Anton Roman wrote: Hi, regarding the missing Contact header in the REFER message, it can be solved by including some lines in /modules_k/dialog/dlg_ transfer.c. In this file, the Contact of the initial INVITE generated with dlg_bridge command can be easily changed

Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-05-27 Thread Anton Roman
Hi, regarding the missing Contact header in the REFER message, it can be solved by including some lines in /modules_k/dialog/dlg_ transfer.c. In this file, the Contact of the initial INVITE generated with dlg_bridge command can be easily changed as well. The problem now is only in the processing

Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-05-25 Thread Juha Heinanen
Klaus Darilion writes: > PS: IIRC there is also an extensions to REFER to omit the implicit > subscription (something like "Refer-light"). In this case the transfered > target should not even send NOTIFY - but I do not know if any clients > support that. if you mean norefersub, i have seen it

Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-05-25 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 25.05.2010 15:46, schrieb Anton Roman: > Regarding the traces I attached in the previous mail, please, omit the > NOTIFY which are being sent to kamailio.org :-), > to work this around I replied this NOTIFY (which indicates the state of > the REFER processing) from the K

Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-05-25 Thread Anton Roman
Hi, you are right, it has to be the same in the original request only when the final response is a non-2xx (RFC3261, 17.1.1.3). The magic cookie is missing so '0' can not be a valid RFC3261 branch, anyway a '0' value populating a param when it should be a random value looks like a buggy situation.

Re: [SR-Users] no Contact in REFER generated with dlg_bridge

2010-05-25 Thread Klaus Darilion
Am 25.05.2010 12:25, schrieb Anton Roman: Hi all, I'm trying to implement a Click2Dial service by using the dlg_bridge command from the dialog module. Although it works in this case, I found two problems in the scenario and I would like to read your opinion about them. 1) Fisrt problem: the R