Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk with multidomain

Hi Tomas, By default in asterisk all domains are accepted and sent to the default context or the context associated with the user/peer placing the call. (from sip.conf.sample) You can specify the context per domain: domain=[,] domain=customer.com,customer-context But you probably might find it e

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio + asterisk

Hello, On 29/01/16 13:14, Вячеслав Завалко wrote: > Is it possible to do a demonstration screen caller using Kamailio + > Asterisk? can you provide more details about what you expect to be done? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/i

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk: Handling loss of SIP BYE and dangling channels

On 01/08/2016 04:32 PM, Benjamin Fitzgerald wrote: I think #1 fixed it for me! Thank you so much! I changed the RTP timeout on a test account SIP account and immediately it resolved the issue. Excellent! Happy to help. You're right, sending a BYE would effectively synchronize them however I

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk: Handling loss of SIP BYE and dangling channels

Alex, I think #1 fixed it for me! Thank you so much! I changed the RTP timeout on a test account SIP account and immediately it resolved the issue. You're right, sending a BYE would effectively synchronize them however I did not think keepalive using OPTIONS scheme would send a BYE message in the

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk: Handling loss of SIP BYE and dangling channels

Benjamin, On 01/08/2016 03:25 PM, Benjamin Fitzgerald wrote: 1. Sorry to be unclear, the Asterisk channel does not stay up indefinitely. We do have a max timeout but since a large portion of our business is based on conference calling, the timeout is rather large. I will definitely change the R

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk: Handling loss of SIP BYE and dangling channels

Hi Alex, Thanks for your quick response. 1. Sorry to be unclear, the Asterisk channel does not stay up indefinitely. We do have a max timeout but since a large portion of our business is based on conference calling, the timeout is rather large. I will definitely change the RTP timeout as my first

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk: Handling loss of SIP BYE and dangling channels

Hi Benjamin, To some extent, this is just a perennial, existential problem of using a proxy, so part of the answer is going to be that you need fundamentally reliable signalling, speaking from the vantage point of something which operates are a signalling relay (i.e. Kamailio). However, I un

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk: Handling loss of SIP BYE and dangling channels

RTP timeout in asterisk is the best place to handle the situation. Another option is SIP session timer, but it could give false negatives with NATed clients. On Friday 08 January 2016 11:56:51 Benjamin Fitzgerald wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering what the best approach to handling a SIP dialog whe

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.

Yes, gateway = asterisk. No, I will capture and then send. Thank you for your help. 2015-12-04 18:17 GMT+00:00 Alex Balashov : > When you say gateway, you mean Asterisk? > > Do you have a capture illustrating this flow? > > On 12/04/2015 01:13 PM, Douglas Adami wrote: > > Yes, I send in public_s

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.

When you say gateway, you mean Asterisk? Do you have a capture illustrating this flow? On 12/04/2015 01:13 PM, Douglas Adami wrote: Yes, I send in public_same_ip:5080 and did not get anything at the gateway. Cheers, Doug 2015-12-04 18:05 GMT+00:00 Alex Balashov mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.c

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.

Yes, I send in public_same_ip:5080 and did not get anything at the gateway. Cheers, Doug 2015-12-04 18:05 GMT+00:00 Alex Balashov : > You mean that you forward the request to localhost:5080, in essence, and > it does not receive it? > > Are you forwarding to localhost:5080 or public_ip:5080? Tha

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.

You mean that you forward the request to localhost:5080, in essence, and it does not receive it? Are you forwarding to localhost:5080 or public_ip:5080? That may traverse different interfaces. And by the same token, do local firewall and/or forwarding policies allow for this? Cheers, -- Ale

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.

Alex, I use Asterisk only as gateway (PSTN). The gateway, when the same IP, does not receive the INVITE, only when it is in another machine. Thanks for your response. Doug ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-u

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + Asterisk, same machine, same public IP.

Doug, If I understood your claim correctly, the INVITE request goes from Kamailio to Asterisk, and Asterisk returns a 401 challenge. This is because Asterisk doesn't trust Kamailio as an incoming source. It probably needs a [correct] sip.conf peer. -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Eva

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode

HI, This is shohana Chowdhury from Bangladesh. I am going to be used a Kamailio SIP server. But i dont i any idea how to install and how could i use it. can anyone show me any way or share any link which is helpful to me. Thanks in advance. -- View this message in context: http://sip-rou

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio-Asterisk real-time integration with Dynamic IP

Hello, forgot about this email after I saw it -- thanks for sharing, I appreciate any contribution to documentation and tutorials. I am sure it will be helpful for others looking at same topology for kamailio-asterisk integration. If you want, you can create a tutorial with your version on the wi

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Asterisk MWI

man From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:mico...@gmail.com] Sent: 24 September 2015 18:49 To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Ansuman Manna - Asergis Telecom Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Asterisk MWI Hello, is the notify after a subscribe request? If yes, it should be routed

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Asterisk MWI

Hello, is the notify after a subscribe request? If yes, it should be routed by Route headers and R-URI. If it is out of a dialog, then very likely you need to location lookup for it. Maybe you can grab such notify from the wire and send it to mailing list in order to see what kamailio should do w

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

On 08/17/2015 01:19 PM, Ben Fitzgerald wrote: Actually I think I've found the issue. The two servers are connected via two different ethernet interfaces. I initially setup the Kamailio user with the IP of eth1 and that worked but Kamailio was trying to connect to MySQL using eth0 (which I did not

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

Actually I think I've found the issue. The two servers are connected via two different ethernet interfaces. I initially setup the Kamailio user with the IP of eth1 and that worked but Kamailio was trying to connect to MySQL using eth0 (which I did not have that IP authorized to connect). By trying

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

The language of the error is ambiguous. "many connection errors" could mean lots of connections, or lots of errors related to connections. Benjamin Fitzgerald LETS Corporation (925) 235-1154 b...@letscorp.us ***Confidential Notice: This message is intended only for the use of the individua

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

I should add, I fixed the error and restarted Kamailio - so it's possible that Kamailio had way more connections at the time of the error but I did not check the stats at that time, I was focused on fixing it. However, I would think it's unlikely for Kamailio to create so many connections. Benjami

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

Oh, I misread your initial post. The error message is about connection "errors", not excessive connections. -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web:

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

Alex, There are 15 total connections and 8 of them are from Kamailio. my.cnf limit is currently set to 500. Benjamin Fitzgerald LETS Corporation (925) 235-1154 b...@letscorp.us ***Confidential Notice: This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is add

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

Ben, if you look at the MySQL server, what does netstat tell you, e.g. netstat --inet -n | grep 3306? -- Alex -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) W

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

Thanks for your quick reply. I left it default, my config is like this: fork=yes children=4 and if I check the process list for Kamailio it looks like there are 11 processes. Even so, this is not near the maximum connections supported by MySQL. Benjamin Fitzgerald LETS Corporation (925) 235-1154

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk Integration - MySQL driver error

Ben, AFAIK, every Kamailio child process creates its own MySQL connection handle. What are your 'children' set to? -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300 Atlanta, GA 30346 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (dire

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

OK. Great Regards 2015-07-17 20:38 GMT+02:00 Ben Fitzgerald : > I think I have fixed the authentication issue yet the SIP dialog has > completely changed. Now the dialog involves Asterisk sending SIP NOTIFY to > Kamailio, which is then forwarded to the client. Kamailio.cfg has no routes > to han

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

I think I have fixed the authentication issue yet the SIP dialog has completely changed. Now the dialog involves Asterisk sending SIP NOTIFY to Kamailio, which is then forwarded to the client. Kamailio.cfg has no routes to handle NOTIFY and there are no SUBSCRIBE messages preceding the NOTIFY. Only

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

Thank you for the qualify solution, that worked. However, on the KB by asipto, they only create a `sipreg` and `sipusers` table and then in extconfig.conf for asterisk, sipusers and sippeers are both using the `sipusers` table in MySQL. I included a sip trace in the original email but I will incl

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

Maybe you got to get some traces with sip set debug on on asterisk or ngrep in kamailio to check whereis the problem. I think you are not authenticating correctly Check if you insert on sipusers and sipppers table what is commented on KB by asipto. Maybe your Kamailio is not responding to OPTION

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

Thanks for your response. I did read the section about the secret in the kb url. I followed the example and inserted the test users on tFe url (101, 102, 103) and they have secret set to NULL. I have tried both secret=NULL and secret="" and Asterisk still asks for authentication. Also when I do "s

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

You could remove secret= on extensiones to check if its related to authentication or not You must not request authentication to kamailio in order to work properly in front of Asterisk As Daniel mention check if Kamailio peer is created and extensiones have no secret.. you would need to add altern

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio & Asterisk SIP Registration Forwarding - Asterisk replies 401 Unauthorized

On Wednesday 15 July 2015 16:42:31 Ben Fitzgerald wrote: > Hi, I've been following this integration tutorial > http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb > and have a successful registration and I can even make calls through my > asterisk box. > > However what is u

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:08:16 PM Anthony Messina wrote: > On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:42:59 PM Alex Balashov wrote: > > Anthony, > > > > The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is: > > m: "Test User" > > > > > yJ DAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUAm6UYzm

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:42:59 PM Alex Balashov wrote: > Anthony, > > The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is: > > m: "Test User" > DAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUAm6UYzm0gme>;+sip.ice > > And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI:

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

On 23 Mar 2015, at 23:42, Alex Balashov wrote: > Anthony, > > The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is: > > m: "Test User" > ;+sip.ice > > And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI: > > NOTIFY > sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Everyone, In my case I am using Path and I asterisk generate NOTIFY with route based on path, then I see on kamailio side tries reach on client on public IP side and open new connection not follow ESTABLISHED/RELATED link then it times out. Log: Mar 23 11:00:17 canlvprx01 /usr/sbin/kam

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Anthony, The Contact presented by the subscriber in the initial subscription is: m: "Test User" ;+sip.ice And the subsequent NOTIFY is correctly targeted to this RURI: NOTIFY sip:172.16.4.7;line=sr-D8G7CE2.5PUeK-xuarl7NYDdNYDxNYlFUYoeUeQ8Cw.6DE2vDdyJDAa4TliwC84OC82LK-2ehwl7NYDdNYDxNYl

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

On Monday, March 23, 2015 06:26:50 PM Alex Balashov wrote: > Hello Anthony, > > On 03/23/2015 06:24 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: > > In my case I am using the TOPOH module and it appears Asterisk may be > > truncating the Request-URI on NOTIFYs*after* the 1st one. Where the 1st > > one is if a user

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Anthony, On 03/23/2015 06:24 PM, Anthony Messina wrote: In my case I am using the TOPOH module and it appears Asterisk may be truncating the Request-URI on NOTIFYs*after* the 1st one. Where the 1st one is if a user gets NOTIFY immediately upon the first SUBSCRIBE, such as when there is

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

On Monday, March 23, 2015 11:18:01 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > not sure you mean transaction as used inside kamailio (tm module), but a SIP > transaction doesn't have anything to do with routing. Kamailio will be able > to route requests/replies even when not creating transacti

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello, not sure you mean transaction as used inside kamailio (tm module), but a SIP transaction doesn't have anything to do with routing. Kamailio will be able to route requests/replies even when not creating transactions (i.e., when it is stateless forwarding). It looks like you get the sip pack

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

o: "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 4:21:47 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, as you can see the 408 is for another request, because the cseq is 103. The first one has cseq 102, but has no Record-Route header, whic

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

t; To: > ;tag=a3aea18741 > Call-ID: 5a66b87a618d1042 > CSeq: 103 NOTIFY > Server: kamailio (4.2.3 (x86_64/linux)) > Content-Length: 0 > > <-> > > > Slava. > > > *From: *"Dan

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

> Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 1:28:33 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, that function might be in textopsx module. Cheers, Daniel On 13/03/15 14

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

pecially Record-Route manipulation. > > Slava. > > > *From: *"Slava Bendersky" > *To: *mico...@gmail.com > *Cc: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM > *Subjec

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

nt: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:54:26 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE. http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Thu

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Daniel, Here paste for first SUBSCRIBE. http://fpaste.org/197545/25118514/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 5:09:17 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Daniel, Is this matter that UDP and TCP transport in mix ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" To: mico...@gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello Daniel, I have record route in

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

match > > http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ > > Slava. > > > > *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" > > *Sent: *Wednesday, Ma

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Daniel, Here debug of the notify which failing. Look like transaction miss match http://fpaste.org/196896/61168591/ Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:44:05 PM Subject: Re

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

? > > Slava. > > > > *From: *"Slava Bendersky" > *To: *mico...@gmail.com > *Cc: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Wednesday, March 11, 2015 4:21:39 PM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamail

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

- > *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" > > *Sent: *Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY > > Hello, > > you have to do record_route()

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: BQ_BEGIN Hello Everyone

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY > > Hello, > > fpaste link doesn't show anything. > > Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamail

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello Daniel, Here fresh paste http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/ I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "sr-users" Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kama

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY

Hello, fpaste link doesn't show anything. Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers? Cheers, Daniel On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Everyone, > Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly. > > asterisk ---> private kamailio public -

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

/ Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" To: mico...@gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 9:08:19 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, Is notify should follow subscribe routes ? Here SUBSCRIBE completely look normal to me. &l

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

er: FPBX-2.11.0(11.15.1) Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, PUBLISH, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: ;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

t; *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"Slava Bendersky" > *Cc: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > Hello, > > I asked for the wrong command, as the bt full was

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

riday, February 27, 2015 8:40:10 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Daniel, Here paste for gdb http://fpaste.org/191338/25043949/ I got REGISTER and SUBSCRIBE start working correctly I see on asterisk correct record routes and sip traffic flow, but when asterisk or client ( s

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

H, MESSAGE Supported: replaces, timer Expires: 3600 Contact: ;expires=3600 Content-Length: 0 Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 6:42:33 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

1/ > > Slava. > > > *From: *"volga629" > *To: *mico...@gmail.com, "Slava Bendersky" > *Cc: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamai

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

e typos are expected. From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Feb 25, 2015 1:04 PM To: Slava Bendersky Cc: sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Hello Daniel, > substr you suggested didn't worked. > See my previous emai

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

Hello Daniel, Here bt full from back trace. http://fpaste.org/191207/50064491/ Slava. From: "volga629" To: mico...@gmail.com, "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:56:48 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hel

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

rom: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"Slava Bendersky" > *Cc: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:04:28 PM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > Hello, > > On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: > >

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

On 25 Feb 2015, at 19:24, Slava Bendersky wrote: > Feb 25 13:13:00 canlvprx01 kamailio: 3(5051) DEBUG: > [parser/msg_parser.c:192]: get_hdr_field(): DEBUG: to body > [ > > This is clearly not a valid sip uri. /O___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Ka

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

ace. Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 12:04:28 PM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, On 25/02/15 17:19, Slava Bendersky wrote: Hello Daniel, substr

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

1:22:24 canlvprx01 kamailio: 11(4770) DEBUG: textops > [textops.c:711]: subst_f(): lst was 0x7fd875e0dd98 > > > That why I asked about this bug report, it close because of limitation > in openser/kamailio. > > Slava. > > ---- &g

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

ot;Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:57:29 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, that's from 2007, closed as invalid -- that was v1.2. Again, as in my previous email, you haven'

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

here some cases where client use ;transport=TLS which need remove > too. > > Slava > > > > *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" > > *Sent: *Wednesday, February 25,

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

-------------- > *From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" > *To: *"Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" > > *Sent: *Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > Hello, > > change the

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

ill try try run gdb to get backtrace on crash. > > Also here link for Fedora 21 server rpms. There are couple small > fixes for init file and sysconfig/kamailio > > > > http://ftpsrv01.networklab.ca/fedora/21/RPMS/x86_64/ > > > > Slava. > > > > Sent from mo

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

Hello Daniel, I found this bug report http://sourceforge.net/p/openser/bugs/226/ Is this still valid ? Slava. From: "Slava Bendersky" To: mico...@gmail.com Cc: "sr-users" Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 9:11:54 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio aster

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

va From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:44:53 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, change the r-uri to use sip instead of sips. You can try with: subst_uri('/^sips

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

ional configuration required ? > > Slava. > > > *From: *"Slava Bendersky" > *To: *mico...@gmail.com > *Cc: *"sr-users" > *Sent: *Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42:02 AM > *Subject:

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

[SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "volga629" , "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

Hello Everyone, Here link to core dump bt full. http://fpaste.org/189799/79603014/ password the same Slava. From: "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" To: "volga629" , "Slava Bendersky" , "sr-users" Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 3:56:48 AM Subject

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

_64/ > > Slava. > > Sent from mobile device typos are expected. > > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla > Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM > To: Slava Bendersky ;sr-users > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk > > > > Hello, > > looking at the logs, the proce

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla Sent: Feb 22, 2015 5:34 PM To: Slava Bendersky ;sr-users Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk Hello, looking at the logs, the process routing the register is forwarding it, by opening a tls connection -- that is because the uri has sips as schema. The cr

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

4440841/ > > > Thank you, > Slava. > > > > *From: *"Olle E. Johansson" > *To: *"Daniel Constantin Mierla" , "sr-users" > > *Sent: *Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM > *Subject: *Re: [SR-User

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

http://fpaste.org/188148/24440702/ Here config file http://fpaste.org/188149/24440841/ Thank you, Slava. From: "Olle E. Johansson" To: "Daniel Constantin Mierla" , "sr-users" Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2015 4:34:04 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamai

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

We also need to check the core file from the crash. /O On 19 Feb 2015, at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your config to me? > > As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the next line > in kam

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk

Hello, can you send the REGISTER request received by kamailio and your config to me? As you receive it over TLS, you can get the register by adding the next line in kamailio.cfg at the beginning of request_route: xlog("received request: [[$mb]]\n"); I will like to double check if the issue is s

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio-Asterisk - route "FROMASTERISK" not found

Hi, thanks for help! I solved it, I have not define route(FROMASTERISK) in my kamailio.cfg Thank you again! Patrik On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > if you search for FROMASTERISK, do you find it on kamailio.cfg? > > Check al

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio-Asterisk - route "FROMASTERISK" not found

Hello, if you search for FROMASTERISK, do you find it on kamailio.cfg? Check also that you have the line: #!define WITH_ASTERISK somewhere at the top of kamailio.cfg. Cheers, Daniel On 20/04/14 08:38, Patrik Kristel wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to implement Kamailio 4.1 with Asterisk 12.1.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio+Asterisk Integrated server: 481 dialog/transaction does not exists error

Hello, Just looking at the capture file, it shows that the Kamailio sends a 200 ok on your invite. The call never gets relayed to the Asterisk box. Maybe you can take http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-4.0.x-asterisk-11.3.0-astdb as a guide, get this working and then start

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode

Hi, Can anyone help me? Looking for ways to configure Kamailio. Thank you, Mickael 2013/6/17 Mickael MONSIEUR > Hello, > First, i have 7 years experience with Asterisk, but I started a project > with Kamailio, forgive me in advance if I say silly things...! ;-) > > I set up a classic Asterisk /

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode

The default configuration of Kamailio already allows all traffic in the Asterisk -> Kamailio ... : #!ifdef WITH_ASTERISK # do not auth traffic from Asterisk - trusted! if(route(FROMASTERISK)) return; #!endif I do not understand why I'm in the trunk mode, it does no

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode

When your Asterisk Box sends calls back to Kamailio do IP auth on the Kamailio and let traffic pass because its from a trusted source. On 6/17/13 4:27 PM, Mickael MONSIEUR wrote: Sorry, I do not understand everything. Can you detail please? 2013/6/17 David | StyleFlare

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode

Sorry, I do not understand everything. Can you detail please? 2013/6/17 David | StyleFlare > You will have to do IP auth on the Kamailio coming from Asterisk > > > On 6/17/13 4:07 PM, Mickael MONSIEUR wrote: > > Hello, > First, i have 7 years experience with Asterisk, but I started a project >

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio - Asterisk, problem with SIP trunk mode

You will have to do IP auth on the Kamailio coming from Asterisk On 6/17/13 4:07 PM, Mickael MONSIEUR wrote: Hello, First, i have 7 years experience with Asterisk, but I started a project with Kamailio, forgive me in advance if I say silly things...! ;-) I set up a classic Asterisk / Kamaili

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

On 6/11/13 10:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 10/06/13 09:32, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: [...] I also posted a query on the asterisk-users list about support for ha1b - would you know if that is something that still comes up in practice? It is in the Kamailio schema, but I have not encount

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

On 10/06/13 13:05, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > On 06.06.2013 16:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On 6/6/13 11:05 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> I was just looking over: >>> >>> http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb >>> >>> >>> >>> A couple of t

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

On 10/06/13 09:32, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > On 6/7/13 11:33 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 06/06/13 16:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 6/6/13 11:05 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: I was just looking over: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:k

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

On 06.06.2013 16:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 6/6/13 11:05 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: I was just looking over: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb A couple of things I noticed: - Kamailio is using a column sippasswd which is not hashe

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

Hello, On 6/7/13 11:33 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 06/06/13 16:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 6/6/13 11:05 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: I was just looking over: http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb A couple of things I noticed: - Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

> > - Asterisk doesn't automatically use it's bind IP:port for outgoing > connections to the proxy - so proxy ACLs are tricky to set up if the > Asterisk host has multiple IPs Asterisk has severe issues - and have had for a long time, with selecting the sender's IP address if you have multiple IP

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio/Asterisk combination + hashed passwords?

On 06/06/13 16:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > On 6/6/13 11:05 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I was just looking over: >> >> http://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdb >> >> >> A couple of things I noticed: >> >> - Kamailio is using a column sippasswd

  1   2   >