Re: [SR-Users] db_cassandra status and plans

2016-03-31 Thread Andreas Granig
Hi Lucian, On 03/31/2016 01:36 PM, Lucian Balaceanu wrote: > At 1&1 we actually haven't used db_cassandra, but were aware of some of > its shortcomings (e.g. thrift interface). > Do you consider Cassandra is stable and easy enough to maintain so as to > use it as usrloc back-end? Are you > also co

Re: [SR-Users] db_cassandra status and plans

2016-03-31 Thread Lucian Balaceanu
Hi guys, At 1&1 we actually haven't used db_cassandra, but were aware of some of its shortcomings (e.g. thrift interface). Do you consider Cassandra is stable and easy enough to maintain so as to use it as usrloc back-end? Are you also considering other alternatives? Have a nice day, Lucian

Re: [SR-Users] db_cassandra status and plans

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello Andreas, On 31/03/16 12:57, Andreas Granig wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On 03/31/2016 12:45 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >> I haven't used Cassandra at all, maybe some of the devs at 1&1 can share >> if they have any plans or usage stats for it, being the initial >> developers of the modul

Re: [SR-Users] db_cassandra status and plans

2016-03-31 Thread Andreas Granig
Hi Daniel, On 03/31/2016 12:45 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > I haven't used Cassandra at all, maybe some of the devs at 1&1 can share > if they have any plans or usage stats for it, being the initial > developers of the module. Let's see if someone chimes in. Not sure if Anca is still inv

Re: [SR-Users] db_cassandra status and plans

2016-03-31 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I haven't used Cassandra at all, maybe some of the devs at 1&1 can share if they have any plans or usage stats for it, being the initial developers of the module. For me it is ok to introduce a new module as well, the old one can be removed afterwards if the new one overtakes it in feature