Re: [SR-Users] about xml rpc response behavior

2016-04-20 Thread ycaner
Hello Daniel;     Thanks , i hope i will be there. 21.04.2016 08:47 tarihinde Daniel-Constantin Mierla-6 [via SIP Router] yazdı: Hello, I added this to the topics to be discussed today during the Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] about xml rpc response behavior

2016-04-20 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I added this to the topics to be discussed today during the Kamailio devel meeting on IRC: - https://www.kamailio.org/wiki/devel/irc-meetings/2016a If you can, you should join to express your opinions there. Cheers, Daniel On 06/04/16 08:09, ycaner wrote: > Hello Daniel; > when i have

Re: [SR-Users] about xml rpc response behavior

2016-04-05 Thread ycaner
Hello Daniel; when i have a look xml spec , you are clearly right. there is no point about it. but i want to one more example about it. When we coding about it, my programmers ask me after send request reload/terminate dialog, "What happened now?" , no response? Because they are used to use "asteri

Re: [SR-Users] about xml rpc response behavior

2016-04-03 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the concern I have is that the return in the params of the result should be data, not a response code embedded in a form or another. For example, if you do rpc list dispatcher records, then there is no return code, just the list of the records. The command was successful as well. If the c