Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-07 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 07.04.17 10:29, Daniel Tryba wrote: > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 06:52:55PM +0200, DanB wrote: >> Many thanks again for premium support as always ;). >> Will get back to them since I understand Kamailio is RFC compatible on this >> one. > Out of curiosity, what type of Avaya PBX are youy having p

Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-07 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 06:52:55PM +0200, DanB wrote: > Many thanks again for premium support as always ;). > Will get back to them since I understand Kamailio is RFC compatible on this > one. Out of curiosity, what type of Avaya PBX are youy having problems with? I only have seen IP Offices on my

Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-06 Thread DanB
Hey Daniel, Many thanks again for premium support as always ;). Will get back to them since I understand Kamailio is RFC compatible on this one. Have a good one! DanB ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-us

Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, tell them to read again the RFC3261, respectively the Via grammar: Via = ( "Via" / "v" ) HCOLON via-parm *(COMMA via-parm) via-parm = sent-protocol LWS sent-by *( SEMI via-params ) via-params= via-ttl / via-maddr / via-received / via-b

Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-05 Thread DanB
Hey Daniel, Indeed, call comes in over tcp and goes out over udp. They claim that it is not RFC compatible to add the i. Thanks, DanB ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://li

Re: [SR-Users] Via header with i attribute

2017-04-04 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, is the traffic coming to Kamailio via tcp? Cheers, Daniel On 04.04.17 16:39, DanB wrote: > Hey Guys, > > > Any of you know which module is adding the "i" attribute and maybe if > it can be removed safely? The reason would be for some Avaya PBXes > discarding the Via completely due to thi