On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Mortensen
wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
>> Hello Andrew,
>>
>> First of all, thank you for sharing your work.
>> I was following this thread and I have a couple of questions. Why do
>> you need to bind to the usrloc module? The su
On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
> Hello Andrew,
>
> First of all, thank you for sharing your work.
> I was following this thread and I have a couple of questions. Why do
> you need to bind to the usrloc module? The subscription itself should
> be sufficient because if a phone wi
On 11/20/12 10:41 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Mortensen
wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 11/20/12 8:43 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
thank for contr
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Andrew Mortensen
wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/20/12 8:43 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
>>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> wrote:
>>>
Hello,
thank for contribution
On Nov 20, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> On 11/20/12 8:43 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
>> On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> thank for contribution!
>>>
>>> On 11/20/12 12:16 AM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 1
On Nov 20, 2012, at 2:11 AM, "Olle E. Johansson" wrote:
>
> 19 nov 2012 kl. 23:19 skrev Andrew Mortensen :
>
>>
>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM, David J wrote:
>>
>>> This looks really awesome. Thanks for sharing
>>
>> Thanks, and you're welcome. I've added very simple installation instruct
Hello Andrew,
First of all, thank you for sharing your work.
I was following this thread and I have a couple of questions. Why do
you need to bind to the usrloc module? The subscription itself should
be sufficient because if a phone will unregister, it will also
unsubscribe, which leads me to the
On 11/20/12 8:43 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
thank for contribution!
On 11/20/12 12:16 AM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it d
On Nov 20, 2012, at 4:08 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thank for contribution!
>
> On 11/20/12 12:16 AM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
>>
>>> Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it does not support
>>> multi-dom
Hello,
thank for contribution!
On 11/20/12 12:16 AM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it does not support multi-domain
setups?
Not yet, no. I don't think it would take much work, though.
I see it b
19 nov 2012 kl. 23:19 skrev Andrew Mortensen :
>
> On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM, David J wrote:
>
>> This looks really awesome. Thanks for sharing
>
> Thanks, and you're welcome. I've added very simple installation instructions
> to the repo.
Do we have any idea on the licensing for this? Th
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
> Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it does not support multi-domain
> setups?
Not yet, no. I don't think it would take much work, though.
andrew
>
>
>
> On 11/19/12 5:49 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
>> It should work with
Also quick read at the readme, it looks like it does not support
multi-domain setups?
On 11/19/12 5:49 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
It should work with 3.1 or newer. The bulk of our testing was done with 3.2 and
3.3.
andrew
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:46 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
By the w
Thanks I am going to try build against git master right now.
And test it out.
On 11/19/12 5:49 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
It should work with 3.1 or newer. The bulk of our testing was done with 3.2 and
3.3.
andrew
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:46 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
By the way what
It should work with 3.1 or newer. The bulk of our testing was done with 3.2 and
3.3.
andrew
On Nov 19, 2012, at 5:46 PM, David | StyleFlare wrote:
> By the way what versions does this support?
>
>
> On 11/19/12 5:19 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM, David J wrote:
By the way what versions does this support?
On 11/19/12 5:19 PM, Andrew Mortensen wrote:
On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM, David J wrote:
This looks really awesome. Thanks for sharing
Thanks, and you're welcome. I've added very simple installation instructions to
the repo.
andrew
On Nov 19,
On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:56 PM, David J wrote:
> This looks really awesome. Thanks for sharing
Thanks, and you're welcome. I've added very simple installation instructions to
the repo.
andrew
> On Nov 19, 2012 4:50 PM, "Andrew Mortensen" wrote:
> I've been working on a Shared Call Appearances
This looks really awesome. Thanks for sharing
On Nov 19, 2012 4:50 PM, "Andrew Mortensen" wrote:
> I've been working on a Shared Call Appearances module for the past several
> months. It implements the Broadsoft SCA feature as laid out in Broadworks
> SIP Access Side Extensions Interface Specific
18 matches
Mail list logo
