: (571) 723-2224
Fax: (703) 439-1350
<mailto:pej...@italkip.com> pej...@italkip.com
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Phil
Lavin
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 10:09 AM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls m
ecipient to ensure this is so.
E-mail is not a 100% secure communication.
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Pejman Rajabian
Sent: 20 May 2016 13:07
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Sequential calls messes up presence with pu
Thanks for your response phil
Kamailio version 4.1.8
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 20, 2016, at 3:17 AM, Phil Lavin wrote:
>
> Which version of Kamailio?
>
> We had a tonne of issues with this module – many of which I submitted fixes
> for.
>
> There were 2 issues that could not be resolved
Which version of Kamailio?
We had a tonne of issues with this module – many of which I submitted fixes for.
There were 2 issues that could not be resolved after a fair bit of trying:
· The presentity table was not cleared of the old state when a new
state occurred (e.g. both trying and
Hello,
I know that there are couple of options to tune the behaviour, like
sending combined body with all active presence states or sending the
most recent one.
Look at the SIP traffic with ngrep or other network capturing tool and
see if you spot something wrong there -- eventuall send the text
