Thanks Daniel - will be back to a desk in the next 30 minutes so should be
enough time to get it in before packaging begins.
Cheers,
Charles
On 10 Sep 2015 11:54, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Btw, if your decision is to backport, go ahead, packaging of 4.3.2 likely
> to start in one hour
Btw, if your decision is to backport, go ahead, packaging of 4.3.2
likely to start in one hour or so.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/09/15 12:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> It doesn't change the config or database to have a deeper
> investigation, therefore if it solving something that currently
> d
It doesn't change the config or database to have a deeper investigation,
therefore if it solving something that currently doesn't work properly,
then all is ok to backport. To me it looks like making that dmq location
replication work, because removing a contact is part of the normal
registration p
Of course, sorry - the commit is here:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/edc25d7373f9560d09a35640ab19741f19b97040
.
Will also require the second part of:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/c7f94fd94500270828fcc4cb3011c60c67a8936b
.
It is implementing the replication of usrloc "
Hi Charles,
can you send quickly what is the commit id in question? Being caught on
some other backports, it will take a while to read the whole thread and
figure out the details -- sometime looking at code is faster to decide
is a new feature or not.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/09/15 11:26, Charles Ch
Hi Daniel,
Do you have a moment to comment on this related question:
http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-dev/2015-September/030663.html?
Cheers,
Charles
On 10 Sep 2015 08:21, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> short note to remind that today kamailio v4.3.1 will be released. If
Hello,
short note to remind that today kamailio v4.3.1 will be released. If
there is anything to push to branch 4.3, write first to sr-dev -- once
the announcement is done, commits to branch 4.3 can go as usual.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 07/09/15 10:27, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am
