Hello,
On 4/18/11 3:21 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote:
Hey there Daniel,
Many thanks for so fast reply!
I will test the scenario recommended in our labs and come back to you asap.
The only thing which is still not clear to me is how to "store" the
used rtp set, so I can re-use it with INVITEs. T
Hey there Daniel,
Many thanks for so fast reply!
I will test the scenario recommended in our labs and come back to you asap.
The only thing which is still not clear to me is how to "store" the
used rtp set, so I can re-use it with INVITEs. The thing which I have
experienced is that on INVITE it i
> What IETF SIP outbound specs you are referring here? Since 3.0, coming
> via ser, the core has support for stun and keepalives according to some
> draft-xxx-sip-outbound, which might be a rfc by now.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5626
___
SIP Express
Hello,
On 4/14/11 9:55 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
14 apr 2011 kl. 09.48 skrev Klaus Darilion:
Am 13.04.2011 15:55, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
If does not work with one instance, I would use branch flags to mark the
branch doing ipv4 to ipv6 translation and engage a dedicated rtpprox
On 4/14/11 11:23 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 14.04.2011 09:55, schrieb Olle E. Johansson:
14 apr 2011 kl. 09.48 skrev Klaus Darilion:
Am 13.04.2011 15:55, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
If does not work with one instance, I would use branch flags to
mark the branch doing ipv4 to ipv6
On 4/14/11 9:48 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Am 13.04.2011 15:55, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
If does not work with one instance, I would use branch flags to mark the
branch doing ipv4 to ipv6 translation and engage a dedicated rtpproxy
for it. You can run two rtpproxy-es on the same serve
Am 14.04.2011 09:55, schrieb Olle E. Johansson:
>
> 14 apr 2011 kl. 09.48 skrev Klaus Darilion:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 13.04.2011 15:55, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
>>> If does not work with one instance, I would use branch flags to
>>> mark the branch doing ipv4 to ipv6 translation and engage a
14 apr 2011 kl. 09.48 skrev Klaus Darilion:
>
>
> Am 13.04.2011 15:55, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
>> If does not work with one instance, I would use branch flags to mark the
>> branch doing ipv4 to ipv6 translation and engage a dedicated rtpproxy
>> for it. You can run two rtpproxy-es on
Am 13.04.2011 15:55, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla:
> If does not work with one instance, I would use branch flags to mark the
> branch doing ipv4 to ipv6 translation and engage a dedicated rtpproxy
> for it. You can run two rtpproxy-es on the same server, in different sets:
> http://kamailio.
Hello,
On 4/13/11 2:10 PM, Dan-Cristian Bogos wrote:
Hey Guys,
I was recently playing with gateway-ing IPv4-IPv6 and hit the
following scenario:
* AOR having contacts on both ipv4 and ipv6 and I wanted to do
parallel forking.
RTPProxy bridging works without any issue on a normal setup, howev
10 matches
Mail list logo
