Hi Daniel,
no problem.
Thank you very much for the support.
Regards.
Antonio
Il 20/07/2015 18:02, Daniel-Constantin Mierla ha scritto:
Hello,
I didn't have time to look at it so far -- quite some traveling lately.
At a quick look, seems that the next hop is not detected as strict
router, I
Hello,
I didn't have time to look at it so far -- quite some traveling lately.
At a quick look, seems that the next hop is not detected as strict
router, I have to look at the code.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 20/07/15 11:20, Antonio Reale wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> did you see something strange in the ACK mes
Hi Daniel,
did you see something strange in the ACK message or you confirm that the
RR module is not behaving correctly?
Thanks.
Regards.
Antonio
Il 14/07/2015 13:02, Antonio Reale ha scritto:
Hi Daniel,
this is the ACK received on Kamailio:
#
U 172.26.130.235:44435 -> 192.168.0.245:5060
Hi Daniel,
this is the ACK received on Kamailio:
#
U 172.26.130.235:44435 -> 192.168.0.245:5060
ACK sip:7240F8EF-55A4D642000CBC22-8A135700@172.16.0.21;transport=udp SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
172.26.130.235:44435;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-1cd3a01fa9171649-1---d8754z-
Max-Forwards: 70
Route:
Route:
Hello,
what is the request URI? It might be better to just paste here the full
ACK message.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 14/07/15 12:25, Antonio Reale wrote:
> Sorry,
> here's the Route HF present in the ACK received from U1:
>
> Route:
> Route:
>
> Regards.
>
> Antonio
>
>
>
> Il 14/07/2015 12:09, Anton
Sorry,
here's the Route HF present in the ACK received from U1:
Route:
Route:
Regards.
Antonio
Il 14/07/2015 12:09, Antonio Reale ha scritto:
Hi all,
I have the following scenario:
U1 (caller) ---> P1 (192.168.0.245, kamailio 4.3, loose-router) >
P2 > (192.168.0.101, strict rout
