Re: [SR-Users] Problems with dispatcher module | feature disabled

2015-11-02 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 28/10/15 15:49, Alessio Casco wrote: > Hello! > > Thanks to @cezar91 we finally spot the issue, basically kamailio it's > transforming t_code=0 (timeout) to 408 and the dispatcher module sees > this last value. > > Oct 28 14:16:32 net21-test /usr/sbin/kamailio[31911]: DEBUG: tm > [t_reply.c:13

Re: [SR-Users] Problems with dispatcher module | feature disabled

2015-10-29 Thread Alessio Casco
Hello! Thanks to @cezar91 we finally spot the issue, basically kamailio it's transforming t_code=0 (timeout) to 408 and the dispatcher module sees this last value. Oct 28 14:16:32 net21-test /usr/sbin/kamailio[31911]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1311]: t_should_relay_response(): -> T_code=0, new

Re: [SR-Users] Problems with dispatcher module | feature disabled

2015-10-28 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, can you want the network traffic and see if the OPTIONS requests are sent out? Cheers, Daniel On 27/10/15 18:59, Alessio Casco wrote: > Hello Daniel! > > Adding the sock_avp parameter, fixes the error on the log, but the > behaviour is the same as before. > > > As you can see, with nothin

Re: [SR-Users] Problems with dispatcher module | feature disabled

2015-10-28 Thread Alessio Casco
Hello Daniel! Adding the sock_avp parameter, fixes the error on the log, but the behaviour is the same as before. As you can see, with nothing listening on those two servers, the loadbalancing it's still disables. SET: { ID: 3 TARGETS: { DEST: { URI: sip:media22-test.internal:5060 FLAGS: AP PR

Re: [SR-Users] Problems with dispatcher module | feature disabled

2015-10-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, it looks like sock_avp parameter has to be set -- it is there before 4.3.0 release, as I could spot in 'git blame' for dispatcher.c:768. Not sure is really needed for failover, I will check its usage when I get first chance. http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#