Hello, Daniel-Constantin!
>I could spot you change the URI in To header and don't restore it for
>replies. Might be that if your cisco is old and does not match on
>rfc3261.
Seems you are right. I test it tomorrow. Thank you!
--
WBR, Victor
JID: coy...@bks.tv
JID: coy...@bryansktel.ru
I
I am not familiar with cisco, if it cannot provide more than these debug
messages.
I could spot you change the URI in To header and don't restore it for
replies. Might be that if your cisco is old and does not match on rfc3261.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 6/6/13 4:29 PM, Victor V. Kustov wrote:
Hello
Hello, Daniel-Constantin!
Pastebin link. Or better post here?
http://pastebin.com/QUGw3t0G
--
WBR, Victor
JID: coy...@bks.tv
JID: coy...@bryansktel.ru
I use FREE operation system: 3.9.4-calculate GNU/Linux
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamai
Hello,
On 6/6/13 2:57 PM, Victor V. Kustov wrote:
Hello!
Updated:
Cisco drop OK message:
*Jun 6 04:53:54.686: //-1//SIP/Info/sipSPILocateInviteDialogCCB:
Could not find matching transaction for this response, Dropping it
*Jun 6 04:53:55.206: //-1//SIP/Info/HandleUd
Hello!
Updated:
Cisco drop OK message:
*Jun 6 04:53:54.686: //-1//SIP/Info/sipSPILocateInviteDialogCCB:
Could not find matching transaction for this response, Dropping it
*Jun 6 04:53:55.206: //-1//SIP/Info/HandleUdpSocketReads: Msg
enqueued for SPI with IP addr: 172
