Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal issue

It looks like you may be running Kamailio behind NAT as well, no? Can you provide any traffic on the connections that fail? Fred Posner The Palner Group, Inc. 503-914-0999 (direct) 954-472-2896 (fax) On 04/03/2014 08:44 AM, Ravi wrote: Dear Kamailio'ns, I am awaiting somebody's suggestions/hi

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal issue

Dear Kamailio'ns, I am awaiting somebody's suggestions/hints/comments on this issue, with that i can proceed further. Please anybody help me in resolving this issue. Any help will mean a lot and greatly appreciate. Regards, Ravi -- View this message in context: http://sip-router.1086192.n5.

Re: [SR-Users] NAT traversal problem with Kamailio when trying to communicate between two different LANs

Did you try this; http://www.palner.com/blog/303/kamailio-behind-nat/#more-303 Regards, Arun From: Neo Quartz To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 8:22 AM Subject: Re: [SR-Users] NAT traversal problem with Kamailio when

Re: [SR-Users] NAT traversal problem with Kamailio when trying to communicate between two different LANs

Hi All, I installed Kamailio server on my ubuntu machine. And installed rtpproxy also in the same machine. I didm't make many changes to default configuration files, kamctlrc and kamailio.cfg. Now I am able to communicate between two SIP clients, if both sip clients are in the same LAN. But I am n

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal Problem

will it be work on NAT Thanks Jagan On 19 April 2013 08:40, PIERRE Laurent wrote: > Hi, > > To enable nat traversal execute RTPProxy. > > http://www.rtpproxy.org > > It supports many thousand calls > > > -- > Laurent PIERRE > > > On 18 April 2013 16:04, Ishan Sawhney wrote: > > Hi, > > > > W

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal Problem

Hi, To enable nat traversal execute RTPProxy. http://www.rtpproxy.org It supports many thousand calls -- Laurent PIERRE On 18 April 2013 16:04, Ishan Sawhney wrote: > Hi, > > We have a solution which requires only outbound NAT on SIP calls. > > Do you have a product which would solve the NAT

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal issue

Hello, great, thanks for replying and closing the thread with the solution. Cheers, Daniel On 12/19/12 2:31 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi wrote: Hi All, Problem solved. It was a CODEC issue. Best Regards, Roy. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi > wrote:

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal issue

Hi All, Problem solved. It was a CODEC issue. Best Regards, Roy. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi wrote: > Hi, > My Kamalio development version works very well with websocket and webrtc > clients. > But when I try to call the guy in remote area (he had connected to the > same serv

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal :: RTPProxy and Jitsi client

Hi Daniel, Thanks for the reply. I am using that flag WITH_NAT and RTPProxy. Please find my config file at http://pastebin.ca/2293600 and let me know I have miss anything there. Best Regards, Roy. On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello,

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal :: RTPProxy and Jitsi client

Hello, you have to do nat traversal for signaling and rtp relaying for media streams. Default configuration file for kamailio includes the solution for this case, using nathelper and rtpproxy. Looking into kamailio.cfg for WITH_NAT token. Cheers, Daniel On 12/14/12 7:37 PM, Raj Roy Ghandhi

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal

So, I've made resetup of network to run tests. I've figured out, that one of the routers were changing SIP headers, i.e. Contacts header to public IP. This caused UAC under this router not to use STUN and gave one way audio. Now I'm using fix_nated_contact and fix_nated_register. Location table c

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 09:53 +0100, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > On 3/2/11 9:32 AM, Spinov Evgeniy wrote: > > Unfortunately ngrep is unavailable right now, cause network was > > configured to use public IPs. May be I'll can do that on development > > network later. Right now development netw

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal

On 3/2/11 9:32 AM, Spinov Evgeniy wrote: Unfortunately ngrep is unavailable right now, cause network was configured to use public IPs. May be I'll can do that on development network later. Right now development network using public`s also. I'll try to sort out ngrep anyway. I was giving FAEI

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal

Unfortunately ngrep is unavailable right now, cause network was configured to use public IPs. May be I'll can do that on development network later. Right now development network using public`s also. I'll try to sort out ngrep anyway. I was giving FAEI to INVITEs from UAC to Asterisk and FAIE to I

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal

Hello, one option might be a bad ALG implementation in the router. Can you send a full ngrep of such case? You can obfuscate the IP addresses, use different ones for each point in the network and leave the ports. Seeing SIP headers and SDP can indicate the presence of an ALG or something brok

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal IPTel example

Hello On 5/5/10 9:00 AM, Andy Savage wrote: Hi there, I've been setting up SER for a testing server on the local network behind a NAT. I'm having problems understanding how to setup the NAT routing in the configuration file. My understanding is that IPTel has already setup advanced NAT rout