Re: [SR-Users] NAPTR for TLS only

2013-01-14 Thread Olle E. Johansson
14 jan 2013 kl. 18:23 skrev Daniel Pocock : > On 14/01/13 15:59, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> The caller should use the NATPR and thus should use TLS. The SIPS+D2T >> does not requires the URI to be a SIPS URI. >> > > That was my understanding too - do you feel it is always working this > way in pr

Re: [SR-Users] NAPTR for TLS only

2013-01-14 Thread Klaus Darilion
On 14.01.2013 18:23, Daniel Pocock wrote: On 14/01/13 15:59, Klaus Darilion wrote: The caller should use the NATPR and thus should use TLS. The SIPS+D2T does not requires the URI to be a SIPS URI. That was my understanding too - do you feel it is always working this way in practice though w

Re: [SR-Users] NAPTR for TLS only

2013-01-14 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 14/01/13 15:59, Klaus Darilion wrote: > The caller should use the NATPR and thus should use TLS. The SIPS+D2T > does not requires the URI to be a SIPS URI. > That was my understanding too - do you feel it is always working this way in practice though with the major SIP proxies/PBXes? Or are an

Re: [SR-Users] NAPTR for TLS only

2013-01-14 Thread Klaus Darilion
The caller should use the NATPR and thus should use TLS. The SIPS+D2T does not requires the URI to be a SIPS URI. See also the thread "NAPTR, SRV and sips vs. transport=tls" from 1.Dec.2012 regards Klaus On 11.01.2013 18:45, Daniel Pocock wrote: I'm just wondering if anyone can comment on