11:52
À : Igor Potjevlesch
Cc : 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
Hello,
I give it a try and I get the message from:
xlog("L_WARN","TU=06\n");
which is the only one that is true in this case. Don't you get it?
Btw
,"TU!=+33\n");
>
> }
>
>
>
> An example of a log in reply_route:
>
>
>
> time=[Thu Feb 5 11:11:07 2015] call id=[4Yir4nAmR7] call seq=[21]
> contact header=[] from
> uri=[sip:0987654...@sip.domain.tld] from tag=[tZ-n7k92e] request's
&
92e] request's
method=[INVITE] request's uri=[] to uri=[sip:0612345678@
sip.domain.tld] to tag=[a94c095b773be1dd6e8d668a785a9c84e15e43ea] sip
message id=[1] process id=[14037] ip source=[A.B.C.D] flags=[2], TU!=06
I'm agree with you: in the case of REPLY, the Request-URI is null
yé :* mardi 27 janvier 2015 16:03
> *À :* mico...@gmail.com; 'Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List'
> *Objet :* RE: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
>
>
>
> The To header looks like this (in compact form):
>
>
>
> t: ;tag=f15e211394273201512715012\r\n
>
>
Users Mailing List'
Objet : RE: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
The To header looks like this (in compact form):
t: ;tag=f15e211394273201512715012\r\n
Regards,
Igor.
De : Igor Potjevlesch [mailto:igor.potjevle...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mardi 27 janvier 2015 15:55
À : mico...
: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
Hello,
can you paste here the SIP message (or at least the To header and request
URI) for such case? I would like to reproduce.
Also, you can try removing components of the expression in the second IF one
by one
Objet : Re: [SR-Users] Multiple OR into a if
Hello,
can you paste here the SIP message (or at least the To header and request
URI) for such case? I would like to reproduce.
Also, you can try removing components of the expression in the second IF one
by one to see where it breaks.
Cheers,
Danie
Hello,
can you paste here the SIP message (or at least the To header and
request URI) for such case? I would like to reproduce.
Also, you can try removing components of the expression in the second IF
one by one to see where it breaks.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 27/01/15 09:45, Igor Potjevlesch wrote:
>
