Hi,
On 10/25/2012 02:51 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> Is there a way in kamailio to statelessy forward a request without
>> putting its own Via header into the message? Consider an example where a
>> stateless load-balancer sends a request to a proxy A, which again
>> statelessy forwards it to a
25 okt 2012 kl. 13:20 skrev Andreas Granig :
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for hijacking this thread, but I've a similar but different
> question which bugs me since a while :)
>
> Is there a way in kamailio to statelessy forward a request without
> putting its own Via header into the message? Consider an ex
Hi,
Sorry for hijacking this thread, but I've a similar but different
question which bugs me since a while :)
Is there a way in kamailio to statelessy forward a request without
putting its own Via header into the message? Consider an example where a
stateless load-balancer sends a request to a pr
Thanks a lot, it worked.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> You better use t_reply("487", "Cancelled") in a failure_route.
>
> Adding a proper Via header might be a tricky task.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 10/25/12 11:43 AM, Vassilis Radis wrote:
>
> I have a s
You better use t_reply("487", "Cancelled") in a failure_route.
Adding a proper Via header might be a tricky task.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/25/12 11:43 AM, Vassilis Radis wrote:
I have a situation where a far end SIP provider doesn't behave
properly when sending 487 replies. The scenario is this:
