Hello,
thanks for sharing the article and the knowledge with the community!
I published a news about it at:
- https://www.kamailio.org/w/2017/02/lcr-system-with-kamailio-on-centos-7/
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/02/2017 14:06, Campus VoToVoice wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My small contribution to Kamailio's
2017-01-16 21:31 GMT+01:00 Mikko Lehto :
> Looks like that parameter is now¹ called dont_strip_or_prefix_flag
> but module documentation was just not updated.
>
> [1] Change was committed in 2010
> https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/8c0501bfaa27acab9721953e8c1551687c96edf2
Pushed the fix
Thnak you...
With dont_strip_or_prefix_flag working.
Regards
El 16/01/2017 a las 15:31, Mikko Lehto escribió:
Annus Fictus :
modparam("lcr", "dont_strip_or_tag_flag", 10)
and then restart kamailio, i receive this error:
ERROR: [modparam.c:141]: set_mod_param_regex(): parameter
of type <2
Annus Fictus :
> modparam("lcr", "dont_strip_or_tag_flag", 10)
>
> and then restart kamailio, i receive this error:
>
> ERROR: [modparam.c:141]: set_mod_param_regex(): parameter
> of type <2> not found in module
Hi
Looks like that parameter is now¹ called dont_strip_or_prefix_flag
but modul
hello;
lcr module dont touch to header. you can use UAC module to manipulate it.
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/LCR-modules-troubles-tp153582p153614.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 03:59:20PM +0200, Loic Chabert wrote:
> - I have some sbc for one destination. If one destination fail, kamailio
> try to second one etc..
> - If no SBC is available for this destination (for exemple, all are down),
> i want to send my call to an error server (asterisk), pla
Loic Chabert writes:
> In fact, kamailio is out from lcr at this point, no more gateway to try
> (all gateways are down).
> I just want to send call to a static server for playing sound.
>
> To be more specific, if no gateways are not set on database, a sound must
> be played.
>
> Should i chang
In fact, kamailio is out from lcr at this point, no more gateway to try
(all gateways are down).
I just want to send call to a static server for playing sound.
To be more specific, if no gateways are not set on database, a sound must
be played.
Should i change $du and $ru to make it work ?
Le 23
Thanks Both Fred/Juha
System is in production when i have a "free slot" i will check repeating
each rule with lower priority. I think that would work as i expect
Thanks for your tips guys!
Have a nice week
Alberto
2016-05-06 13:44 GMT+02:00 Juha Heinanen :
> Alberto Sagredo writes:
> >
> > I
Have you considered either dispatcher or just using a failure route?
-- Fred
> On May 6, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Alberto Sagredo
> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have it working but i have re-read documentation and do not see how to do
> what i need.
>
> I explain it :)
>
> Now i have only one LCR provide
Hello,
did you use t_relay() after all the lcr logic?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/16 23:19, Roberto Innaimi wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> i want to use prefix based LCR routing, but for some reason, something
> is not working as expected.
>
> Can anyone help me?
>
> This is the LCR configuration:
>
>
>
On 02/03/16 08:54, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Alberto Sagredo writes:
>
>> I have just edited kamctl in order to make lcr commands work. Hope that
>> helps someone.
>>
>> Using Kamailio 4.3.0
>>
>> Please find kamctl attached also
> Alberto,
>
> Thanks for your kamctl contribution. If you like it to
Thank you!
That resolved my issue :)
2016-02-18 17:23 GMT+01:00 ycaner :
> There is parameter for lcr_id. you need to set max lcr_count in .cfg.
>
> lcr_count
> lcr_gw_count
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/LCR-Module-issue-tp145861p145863.ht
There is parameter for lcr_id. you need to set max lcr_count in .cfg.
lcr_count
lcr_gw_count
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/LCR-Module-issue-tp145861p145863.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
15.02.2016 11:11, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Alexey V. Panfilov writes:
>
>> It's a pity. May I ask (as feature request) to add it to the future
>> version of Kam?
>
> I currently don't need such a feature. It might be possible to
> implement it by adding target_id field to struct target and to stru
Alexey V. Panfilov writes:
> It's a pity. May I ask (as feature request) to add it to the future
> version of Kam?
I currently don't need such a feature. It might be possible to
implement it by adding target_id field to struct target and to struct
matched_gw_info. Then add_gws_into_avps() functi
15.02.2016 10:13, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Alexey V. Panfilov writes:
>
>> I'm using LCR module in my kamailio setup. I can access to the
>> gw_uri_avp's value of matched gateway, but I'd like to get value of
>> selected id of lcr_rule_target. Is there any way to get it?
>
> id of lcr_rule_target i
Hello;
i commented your last commit. Sorry , i think i couldn't explain
situation.
Here is log for more understand.
- Here is first load_gws and next_gws() functions are
called-
6(10299) DEBUG: lcr [
ycaner writes:
> in load_gws function
> there is a delete_avp for gw_uri_avp as you mentioned . but in my
> view it needs a delete_avp for ruri_user_avp.
> Because it is reloading gws for different route.
I added deletion of possible old ruri_user_avp value when next_gw()
in load_gws function
there is a delete_avp for gw_uri_avp as you mentioned . but in my
view it needs a delete_avp for ruri_user_avp.
Because it is reloading gws for different route.
Thanks.
04.12.2015 11:44 tarihinde Juha
Heinanen [via SI
ycaner writes:
> Thanks for reply. before load_gws , setting ruri_user_avp to null solves
> request uri problems.
load_gws() tries to delete possibly existing avp values by this
statement:
delete_avp(gw_uri_avp_type|AVP_VAL_STR, gw_uri_avp);
obviously there is something wrong with if the av
Hey;
Thanks for reply. before load_gws , setting ruri_user_avp to null solves
request uri problems.
--
View this message in context:
http://sip-router.1086192.n5.nabble.com/LCR-module-re-load-gws-uri-errors-tp143602p143648.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
ycaner writes:
> when first usage of load_gws() and next_gw() functions , next_gw() fills all
> uri avps to ru_AVPs from gws tables. if it goes to failure route or route
> again , it can re use ru_AVPs in next_gw(). so if recall the load_gws()
> again for choose new route , it uses old uri avps i
Hello;
i found the problem i hope i can explain the problem to get solution.
when first usage of load_gws() and next_gw() functions , next_gw() fills all
uri avps to ru_AVPs from gws tables. if it goes to failure route or route
again , it can re use ru_AVPs in next_gw(). so if recall the load_gws
thanks to all
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Alexandru Covalschi <568...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> 2015-08-11 13:19 GMT+03:00 DanB :
>
>> Hi Alexandru,
>>
>> Well the concept is simple: on INVITE, you will issue a special format
>> evapi request. You will receive the list of suppliers in
Thanks!
2015-08-11 13:19 GMT+03:00 DanB :
> Hi Alexandru,
>
> Well the concept is simple: on INVITE, you will issue a special format
> evapi request. You will receive the list of suppliers in the reply (which
> is received in a separate route) and you continue processing from there.
> These suppl
Hi Alexandru,
Well the concept is simple: on INVITE, you will issue a special format
evapi request. You will receive the list of suppliers in the reply
(which is received in a separate route) and you continue processing from
there. These suppliers are simple tags so your creativity will be the
DanB, well, I never used it - can you please describe how does it work? :)
I mean, the logic in short
2015-08-10 13:15 GMT+03:00 DanB :
> Guys,
>
> Since I saw the thread growing, I am around if you got questions on
> CGRateS related LCR, fully compatible with Kamailio via evapi module.
>
> DanB
Guys,
Since I saw the thread growing, I am around if you got questions on
CGRateS related LCR, fully compatible with Kamailio via evapi module.
DanB
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-route
you already have cost, just write a script to transform it into weight, I
don't see a hard task here. It can be easily automated
2015-08-09 21:15 GMT+03:00 Arun Kumar :
> hi Alexandru
>
>so we have manually set prefix , weight and priority
> depanding upon rates ? is there any aval
hi Alexandru
so we have manually set prefix , weight and priority depanding
upon rates ? is there any avaliable way to automate or we have to
rewrite/modify the lcr/drouting module for rate selection ,
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Alexandru Covalschi <568...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Arun Kumar writes:
> but above guide is only prefix priority and weight based , but we should
> involve rate as well.
may be you can use priority as your rate.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-us
t
Reply To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] LCR Routing - Cost based routing
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/l
however you can try building LCR based on prefix and weight, why not?
2015-08-09 18:52 GMT+03:00 Alexandru Covalschi <568...@gmail.com>:
> I know CGRateS allow cost-based LCR for Kamailio. Maybe there are some
> internal Kamailio modules, but I don't know about them
>
> 2015-08-09 17:10 GMT+03:00
I know CGRateS allow cost-based LCR for Kamailio. Maybe there are some
internal Kamailio modules, but I don't know about them
2015-08-09 17:10 GMT+03:00 Arun Kumar :
> but above guide is only prefix priority and weight based , but we should
> involve rate as well.
> ,
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 a
but above guide is only prefix priority and weight based , but we should
involve rate as well.
,
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Alexandru Covalschi <568...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Or, well, see that guide
> http://dopensource.com/least-cost-routing-with-kamailio-v4-1/ - we have
> priority and wei
Or, well, see that guide
http://dopensource.com/least-cost-routing-with-kamailio-v4-1/ - we have
priority and weight on LCR module
2015-08-09 12:37 GMT+03:00 Alexandru Covalschi <568...@gmail.com>:
> try using CGRateS
>
> 2015-08-09 12:06 GMT+03:00 Arun Kumar :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> is there any way
try using CGRateS
2015-08-09 12:06 GMT+03:00 Arun Kumar :
> Hi
>
> is there any way to achive following usecase using carrier route /
> LCR / droude module
>
> i have 10 different termination gateways, each gateways will have more
> than 1 destinations and each gateways will have differe
The Tag column size is 64. If I make this larger in the database, will
it be truncated once it is loaded into memory?
According to modules source code Tag's max size is hardcoded and will be
truncated. But this is not a bit problem. You can keep capabilities list
in htable and only put a key
t
of both methods.
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Vitaliy Aleksandrov
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 12:27 PM
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] LCR with gateway capabilities
On 29/04/15 12:34, Grant Bagdasarian wrote:
That s
r.org
*Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] LCR with gateway capabilities
What about configuring two LCR instances with different "lcr_id".
The first one can use only gateways with requested capabilities and
the second one all gateways.
Then you can make a decision about which instance to use durin
d g711ulaw codec? Etc.
Wouldn't this cause the data to grow exponentially?
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Vitaliy Aleksandrov
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 10:36 AM
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] LCR with gateway cap
What about configuring two LCR instances with different "lcr_id".
The first one can use only gateways with requested capabilities and the
second one all gateways.
Then you can make a decision about which instance to use during call
routing process providing this lcr_id to load_gws() function.
Satish Patel writes:
> Thanks for replay, anyone did that before? Any example or sample
> script will help.
you just call load_gw() first and then make next_gw() calls until call
succeeds. this is explained in the README.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Rout
Thanks for replay, anyone did that before? Any example or sample script will
help
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Satish Patel writes:
>
>> I heard somewhere LCR can do routing based on call rate and call
>> price, does it true? I haven't seen any con
Hi Keith,
you can take the from userpart from the pseudovar $fU. Find further
infos on the pseudovar documentation site:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/4.1.x/pseudovariables
After that you can try to match that with the module regex, see
documentation here:
http://kamailio.org/docs/module
Keith writes:
> I want to do LCR based on from uri. I get I need to do regular expression
> matching but have no idea where to look to start.
see lcr module readme if lcr module from uri matching meets your needs.
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER)
Hi,
I want to do LCR based on from uri. I get I need to do regular expression
matching but have no idea where to look to start.
Any pointers would be good.
Thanks
Keith
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users
Keith writes:
> Is there a way I can manipulate the CLI based on the destination the call
> is being sent to?
you can, for example, set a lcr_gw flag that tells what the
representation of cli need to be and then add p-a-i header accordingly.
-- juha
_
Hi all,
I have an issue where I have two carriers, one only accepts +44 then the
CLI and the other only accepts the number with the leading zero dropped.
I am using LCR to route to carriers, however I can only switch carriers by
manually altering the CLI.
Is there a way I can manipulate the CLI
Geoffrey Mina writes:
> What can I do to debug this? I checked and we aren't seeing any of the
> "failed to compile regex" errors in the logs. We have 4 servers that are
> all displaying the same behavior (read: ignoring the from_uri match on a
> lower priority).
you didn't answer if this issue
Juha,
Thank you for all of your help so far, but we are still totally stuck
trying to make this work. We have double and triple checked our
configuration, database, and INVITE and everything is in-line with what
previously worked (in 1.5). We are running 4.1.3, is that what you were
testing on?
Geoffrey Mina writes:
> Right now, I would think that with our Priority of 0 on the route with the
> from_URI match, the algorithm should always look at that one first and
> route the calls accordingly.
>
> Since we have the priority correctly set to evaluate in the order we want,
> what next can
OK, has this behavior changed since Kamailio 1.5 because this previously
worked.
Right now, I would think that with our Priority of 0 on the route with the
from_URI match, the algorithm should always look at that one first and
route the calls accordingly.
Since we have the priority correctly set
Geoffrey Mina writes:
> OK. WE have made a change so that the priority is 0 for the route that has
> the from_uri. We are still not seeing this route get matched
> properly.
i tried to say that from uri plays no role in your lcr setup, because +1
matches both rules 31 and 5. if you want it mat
OK. WE have made a change so that the priority is 0 for the route that has
the from_uri. We are still not seeing this route get matched properly.
Here is what the INVITE looks like:
INVITE sip:+19137274555@1.2.3.4:5060 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 1.2.3.4:5060;branch=z9hG4bK5b52e524;rport
From: "20
Keith writes:
> I am having issues with trying to use multiple lcr_ids so I can route to
> different groups. When I reload lcr it always only shows one group. I have
> copied the first group exactly and just changed the number but can't work
> out why it's not working.
check lcr_count module para
Hi,
I am having issues with trying to use multiple lcr_ids so I can route to
different groups. When I reload lcr it always only shows one group. I have
copied the first group exactly and just changed the number but can't work
out why it's not working.
Any ideas?
Thanks
Keith
_
Pete Ashdown writes:
> Thank you Juha. I'm muddling through this. One thing that is puzzling
> to me is that LCR entries are ranked by weight and priority, both
> integers. When I have a rate deck of costs like .003211 per minute per
> prefix, translating thousands of those to integers between
On 01/22/2014 03:19 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Pete Ashdown writes:
>
>> 2) How do I populate the rest of the LCR database? It appears that
>> using "kamctl lcr" has been depreciated. Am I supposed to use Siremis?
>> Is there any way to do this via shell? Does anyone have any scripts
>> that di
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 23:19:09 Juha Heinanen wrote:
> prefix column cannot hold a regular expression. lcr routing is based on
> longest match, which cannot be efficiently implemented using regular
> expressions.
If lcr is based on longest prefix, Pete could just use a little logic to
impl
Juha Heinanen writes:
> the param is there in order to save shared memory and speed up those
> functions that operate on lcr instances.
^ all
-- juha
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing lis
Geoffrey Mina writes:
> OK. I updated that to 10 and now it loads both. Is there any harm in
> making it 100 even though I will never use that many? Just so I don't need
> to restart Kamailio to add new routes?
the param is there in order to save shared memory and speed up those
functions that
OK. I updated that to 10 and now it loads both. Is there any harm in
making it 100 even though I will never use that many? Just so I don't need
to restart Kamailio to add new routes?
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Geoffrey Mina writes:
>
> > I am still a little baffl
Gary Chen writes:
> In this case if you have several sets of lcr_id, you will end up with
> several duplicate gateway and rulls.
it is possible to define gateways that are common to all lcr instances.
lcr_id of such gws is 0.
-- juha
___
SIP Express R
Thanks. I included ctl.so module and now I can properly use kamcmd to
reload LCR.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Gary Chen wrote:
> lcr_rule_target is like a glue to link lcr_gw and lcr_rule tables together
> through rule_id and gw_id as well as lcr_id.
> In this case if you have several
lcr_rule_target is like a glue to link lcr_gw and lcr_rule tables together
through rule_id and gw_id as well as lcr_id.
In this case if you have several sets of lcr_id, you will end up with
several duplicate gateway and rulls. It is not the best design and is hard
to use.
To reload lcr you do this
What is the value of the "target" table? Previously the lcr rule table was
directly tied to the gateway. Is this simply to enable N:1 relationships
between lcr rules and gateways.
Also - any idea how to reload the LCR configuration without restarting
kamailio? I previously issued "kamctl fifo l
First thing to remember that lcr_id field is the one to link all three
tables together. Let's say that you want to create a lcr to route
international call starting with 011:
1) Create a row in lcr_gw table with id = 4, lcr_id = 3 and gateway IP etc.
2) Then create a row in lcr_rule table with id =
Hi Juha,
Many thanks, finally with lcr_id is ok. I make a few changes in my config
and work ok.
Cheers
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Eloy Coto Pereiro writes:
>
> > Any solution to check the rule extra info. I want route billing info to
> put
> > in the acc. Any sta
Eloy Coto Pereiro writes:
> Any solution to check the rule extra info. I want route billing info to put
> in the acc. Any standar solution?
i quickly looked the code and seems like rule_id would need to be added
to matched_gw_info struct when load_gws() is called and copied from
there as a new fi
Hi
Thanks Juha for your response.
Any solution to check the rule extra info. I want route billing info to put
in the acc. Any standar solution?
Cheers
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Eloy Coto Pereiro writes:
>
> > It Is possible get the rule_id after execute next_gw
Hello,
try printing the $ru with xlog statement when the request comes into the
server and in the beginning of route[LCR].
On 11/01/2013 01:50, Douglas Ugalde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im trying to configure LCR in Kamailio 3.3.3 but I dont Know how can I
> do to fix this error:
>
> ERROR: lcr [lcr_mod.
(SER) - Users
Mailing List
Subject: RE: [SR-Users] LCR Failover
Kamailio sends the following when the first gateway times out. Failure route is
never executed and next_gw specified in route block still results in the
following.
Asterisk placed call to kamailio:
U kamailio:5060 -> asterisk:
ip-router.org
[mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Daniel W. Graham
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 12:42 PM
To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] LCR Failover
Gave that a try still without success.
-Ori
Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] LCR Failover
Daniel W. Graham writes:
> Makes sense, would LCR module permit this scenario to work in a
> different configuration? Or should I be looking at another module? I
> could use dispatcher but I'd like the ability to add additional r
Daniel W. Graham writes:
> Makes sense, would LCR module permit this scenario to work in a
> different configuration? Or should I be looking at another module? I
> could use dispatcher but I'd like the ability to add additional routes
> based on prefix in the future.
if t_relay fails and failure
Makes sense, would LCR module permit this scenario to work in a different
configuration? Or should I be looking at another module? I could use dispatcher
but I'd like the ability to add additional routes based on prefix in the future.
-Original Message-
From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-r
Sorry all, my message got cut off.
I have the following in database tables:
Lcr_gw -
Lcr_id 1, gw_name gw1, ip_addr x.x.x.x
Lcr_id 1, gw_name gw1, ip_addr x.x.x.x
Rule_target-
Lcr_id 1, rule_id 1, gw_id 1, priority 1, weight 1
Lcr_id-1, rule_id 1, gw_id 2, priority 2, weight 1
Lcr_rule -
Lcr_id
Camila Troncoso writes:
>scripts are provided in lcr/utils directory that can be used to check
>the probabilities resulting from a given set of weight values. Same can
>be done with command 'kamctl eval_weights'.
>
> I really don't understand what is the probability finally assign to
Hi,
Here is a copy of part of README:
"
When the function load_gws() is called, matching gateways (that are not
currently designated as defunct) are ordered for forwarding purposes as
follows:
* (1) according to longest user part match
* (2) according to tuple's priority
*
Graham Wooden (personal) writes:
> Thanks for the reply Juha. I have a 3.3.0 system that I have been trying
> to get my routing logic converted over. I will keep working on that.
ok, let the list know if you experience any lcr problems with 3.3 and
we'll try to fix them.
-- juha
__
Thanks for the reply Juha. I have a 3.3.0 system that I have been trying
to get my routing logic converted over. I will keep working on that.
Thanks again,
-graham
On 8/6/12 12:12 PM, "Juha Heinanen" wrote:
>Graham Wooden (personal) writes:
>
>> What kind of debugging can I do on this gateway
Hello,
I experience the same issue in 3.1.5
best regards,
Antanas Masevicius
On 2012.03.01 08:07, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Ben WIlliams writes:
>
>> here is the dump, prefix 8 should use gateway number 2. Its not a big
>> issue, I've managed to do it without LCR now.
>>
>> INSERT INTO `lcr_gw`
Thanks, it works as expected.
>2012/4/12 Juha Heinanen :
> if (!load_gws(1, $rU, $fu)) {
--
"В связи с отсутствием интереса общественности, конец света отменяется" (с) ?
С Уважением, Механошин Алексей
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER)
Alexey Mechanoshin writes:
> > If uri_user is given, it is used, instead of Request-URI user part,
> > to look for matching gateways.
yes, but since you need also caller's uri, you must call load_gw() like
this:
if (!load_gws(1, $rU, $fu)) {
> My test change simple load_gws(1) to load_gws(1,$f
> If uri_user is given, it is used, instead of Request-URI user part, to look
> for matching gateways
In my config only lcr_id:
...
mhomed=1
...
if (!load_gws(1)) {
...
and not local registered user and not allow local users subscribe.
A'm this calls:
192.xxx.xxx.59
Alexey Mechanoshin writes:
> Apr 11 17:55:41 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[14873]: INFO:
Ok, change to LM_INFO and retry invite from master branch, by kamailio:
#make FLAVOUR=kamailio cfg
...
#make deb
(Debian squeze)
Apr 11 17:55:41 r59vredfs /usr/sbin/kamailio[14873]: INFO:
i added a dbg statement in lcr_mod.c that prints log message if from uri
matching fails. you can try with latest master and see what you get
into syslog at debug level 3 or convert load_gws() LM_DBG statement to
LM_INFO statements and try at debug level 2.
-- juha
___
Thanks for reply.
Ok, my change in DB to :
| 5 | 1 | 5499 | sip:5...@192.xxx.xxx.59 | 0 | 1 |
and restart kamailio.
Then, in cfg:
request_route {
xlog("L_INFO", "New request - M=$rm RURI=$ru F=$fu T=$tu
IP=$si ID=$ci\n");
Log:
New request - M=INVITE RURI=sip:5...@192.x
Jeff Russell writes:
> I wish that were the case, I am already logging this and there is
> nothing wrong with the URI , it there seems to be no issues if I use
> another non-lcr route :(
> xlog("L_NOTICE","route[IVR]: Original URI <$tu>\n");
you are logging $tu, which has nothing to do with lc
Grrr..
My apologies, your right! (whoda thunk it), the error was because this was for
a register, not a route, that has now been taken care of and I'll work a little
more on getting the right info into the LCR db tables.
May thanks, sorry about my ineptitude.
Jeff
On 2012-04-04, at 2:05 AM
I wish that were the case, I am already logging this and there is nothing wrong
with the URI , it there seems to be no issues if I use another non-lcr route :(
also, I would really like and example of what the contents of the db should be.
Again, many thanks,
Jeff
xlog( "L_NOTICE", "here");
Jeff Russell writes:
> I am still struggling a little with this, I have everything working,
> postgres & lcr modules loading what I am looking for for is a
> difinative working example of the information in the db tables.
your problem:
> at present I get the following errors 'error while parsing
I am still struggling a little with this, I have everything working, postgres &
lcr modules loading what I am looking for for is a difinative working example
of the information in the db tables.
my db tables:
lcr_rule
(lcr_id, prefix, from_uri, stopper, enabled, id)
lcr_rule_target
(rule_id, gw
Jeff Russell writes:
> We have a table with about 145,000 NPA/NXX's with differing rates and
> carriers, I would like to use the LCR module to load this table and
> rewrite the URI based on the best rate for dialled number and or a
> default route.
lcr module selects the gateways first based on l
Details...
We have a table with about 145,000 NPA/NXX's with differing rates and carriers,
I would like to use the LCR module to load this table and rewrite the URI based
on the best rate for dialled number and or a default route. The new 'in
memory" LCR module should be efficient enough (we a
The quality of responses to your request would be increased by a brief
statement of your objective. Despite its tantalising name, the 'lcr' module
may not be the most appropriate solution to your problem, depending on what
exactly your problem is.
--
This message was painstakingly thumbed out
Ben WIlliams writes:
> here is the dump, prefix 8 should use gateway number 2. Its not a big
> issue, I've managed to do it without LCR now.
>
> INSERT INTO `lcr_gw` VALUES
> (1,1,'chc','1.1.1.1',NULL,NULL,NULL,1,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,NULL),(2,1,'ak','2.2.2.2',NULL,NULL,NULL,1,1,NULL,NULL,NULL,1,NUL
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
