Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Blind Call Forwarding

2016-04-19 Thread Nagorny, Dimitry
Mailing List /*Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Blind Call Forwarding /* /*On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:26:40PM +0300, Juha Heinanen wrote: /*> > No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent call legs. This is a /*> > function of a B2BUA. /*> /*> Yes, real easy with SEMS, for example.

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Blind Call Forwarding

2016-04-19 Thread Daniel Tryba
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 07:26:40PM +0300, Juha Heinanen wrote: > > No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent call legs. This is a > > function of a B2BUA. > > Yes, real easy with SEMS, for example. In the past I have used the topoh module with success to counter such antiloop detection: Avaya IP

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Blind Call Forwarding

2016-04-18 Thread Marrold
I'm curious what issue you're trying to fix or what functionality you're trying to add? If we know the contact, we might be able to suggest a kamailio only solution. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Alex Balashov writes: > > > No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent cal

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Blind Call Forwarding

2016-04-18 Thread Juha Heinanen
Alex Balashov writes: > No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent call legs. This is a > function of a B2BUA. Yes, real easy with SEMS, for example. -- Juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.si

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Blind Call Forwarding

2016-04-18 Thread Alex Balashov
No, Kamailio cannot build new, independent call legs. This is a function of a B2BUA. ‎ -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.co