Hey Olle,
On 11 Oct 2016 10:54, "Olle E. Johansson" wrote:
>
>
>> On 11 Oct 2016, at 09:46, José Seabra wrote:
>>
>> Hi Charles,
>> Sorry for my late reply.
>> I have tried that parameter but seems that for the dmq FQDN kamailio
doesn't send a NAPTR query.
>> Even for the SRV query, the kamailio
> On 11 Oct 2016, at 09:46, José Seabra wrote:
>
> Hi Charles,
> Sorry for my late reply.
> I have tried that parameter but seems that for the dmq FQDN kamailio doesn't
> send a NAPTR query.
> Even for the SRV query, the kamailio makes it without service
> associated(_sip._udp).
>
We should p
Hi Charles,
Sorry for my late reply.
I have tried that parameter but seems that for the dmq FQDN kamailio
doesn't send a NAPTR query.
Even for the SRV query, the kamailio makes it without service
associated(_sip._udp).
Thank you.
Best regards
José Seabra
2016-09-26 13:07 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance
Hi José,
On 21 September 2016 at 18:28, José Seabra wrote:
> Hello,
> I have a doubt related with DMQ dns behavior, I noticed that when kamailio
> starts, it tries to resolve DMQ name configured on parameter
> notification_address as the following sequence:
>
>1. SRV
>2. A
>3.
>
Thank you Charles,
Cheers
José Seabra
2016-09-22 14:19 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
> Hi,
>
> On 22 September 2016 at 14:08, José Seabra wrote:
>
>> Hi charles,
>> Inline
>> Thanks
>>
>> 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance
>> :
>>
>>> Hi José,
>>>
>>> In your config, you need to tell DMQ ab
Hi,
On 22 September 2016 at 14:08, José Seabra wrote:
> Hi charles,
> Inline
> Thanks
>
> 2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
>
>> Hi José,
>>
>> In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node.
>> This can be in the form of an IP or FQDN - however, where the FQDN
Hi charles,
Inline
Thanks
2016-09-22 13:51 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
> Hi José,
>
> In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node.
> This can be in the form of an IP or FQDN - however, where the FQDN resolves
> to a single IP, it does not make sense to perform anything o
Hi José,
In your config, you need to tell DMQ about a minimum of one other node.
This can be in the form of an IP or FQDN - however, where the FQDN resolves
to a single IP, it does not make sense to perform anything other than an A
lookup, so you should set the parameter to 0 in this case.
The nu
Hi Charles
I have modparam("dmq", "multi_notify", 1) because my A record resolves more
than one Kamailio addresses, and if i understood well the documentation
says that we need set it to a value different of 0 to resolve all ip
addresses associated to the Name configured on DMQ.
I'm using DMQ with
Hey,
On 22 September 2016 at 12:18, José Seabra wrote:
> Hello Daniel and Charles,
> Thank you for your feedback.
> Another doubt is when we use a FQDN that only resolves as A record, would
> be better DMQ send only a A query or is there any reason for always try SRV?
>
>
As far as I recall (it'
Hello Daniel and Charles,
Thank you for your feedback.
Another doubt is when we use a FQDN that only resolves as A record, would
be better DMQ send only a A query or is there any reason for always try SRV?
Thank you for your great job.
BR
José Seabra
2016-09-22 8:33 GMT+01:00 Charles Chance :
>
Hello,
I can take a look today.
Cheers,
Charles
On 22 Sep 2016 06:20, "Daniel-Constantin Mierla" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I guess that the one who did the implementation of the srv query for dmq
> hasn't "allocated" any service name. I haven't looked at the sources, but I
> guess it should be a sma
Hello,
I guess that the one who did the implementation of the srv query for dmq
hasn't "allocated" any service name. I haven't looked at the sources,
but I guess it should be a small patch to compose the srv dns string to
be queried -- maybe that part can be made a mod param so each can choose
its
13 matches
Mail list logo
