Re: [SR-Users] Issue with Double Record Route

On 24/02/16 10:13, Alberto Sagredo wrote: > Thanks Daniel > > I think i got this solved :) Great! Welcome, Daniel > > Record-Route: . > > Record-Route: . > > Cheers! > > > 2016-02-24 9:42 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla >: > > Hello, > > my remark was rela

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with Double Record Route

Thanks Daniel I think i got this solved :) Record-Route: . Record-Route: . Cheers! 2016-02-24 9:42 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Hello, > > my remark was related to the fact that you may have another > record_route*() function executed in the configuration file for the same > SIP req

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with Double Record Route

Hello, my remark was related to the fact that you may have another record_route*() function executed in the configuration file for the same SIP request. It may be simpler also from routing/security point of view to use different ports for internal and external communications. E.g., port 5060 for

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with Double Record Route

Hi Daniel I use it once, i have read about double record routing and it seems in kamailio only possible if two ips are configured?: Im using Kamailio behind NAT with advertised address and proxy to an external provider but i have seen , with Asterisk behind, Record route is wrong to Asterisk so i

Re: [SR-Users] Issue with Double Record Route

Hello, can you check in the config and see if there is any other record_route*() function used? Cheers, Daniel On 23/02/16 18:43, Alberto Sagredo wrote: > Im fancing some issues due to kamailio behind nat and thought double > record route could help me . > > But enabling that : > > modparam("rr