Re: [SR-Users] Failure Route and Reply Routes

2011-02-19 Thread Klaus Darilion
Brandon Armstead wrote: Alex, Thank you for this information! This is now making some more sense as to the results I am seeing. Thanks again! As an addition: Reply routes can be separated in to the "default reply route" and "named reply routes": The "default reply route" is executed

Re: [SR-Users] Failure Route and Reply Routes

2011-02-17 Thread Brandon Armstead
Alex, Thank you for this information! This is now making some more sense as to the results I am seeing. Thanks again! Sincerely, Brandon Armstead On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 02/17/2011 05:07 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>Is there any speci

Re: [SR-Users] Failure Route and Reply Routes

2011-02-17 Thread Alex Balashov
On 02/17/2011 05:07 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote: Hello, Is there any specific information / documentation as to what kind of response causes the failure_route to trigger over the reply_route. For example, it seems that 486 response triggers the failure route while as a 408 triggers the reply