El día 26 de julio de 2010 12:48, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
escribió:
>> To clarify: when you call t_on_branch("N") it means that *after*
>> calling t_relay() the block branch_route[N] will be executed for
>> *each* branch.
>> So the position of t_on_branch() is not important (it must be before
On 07/26/2010 06:48 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 11:21:02 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El día 26 de julio de 2010 07:20, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
escribió:
Umm ... again confused ... does the execution of the cfg continues AFTER
the append_branch call,just
On Monday 26 July 2010 11:21:02 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El día 26 de julio de 2010 07:20, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
>
> escribió:
> > Umm ... again confused ... does the execution of the cfg continues AFTER
> > the append_branch call,just on the next line ... or it "begins"
> > on "t_on_bra
El día 26 de julio de 2010 07:20, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
escribió:
> Umm ... again confused ... does the execution of the cfg continues AFTER the
> append_branch call,just on the next line ... or it "begins"
> on "t_on_branch()"?
To clarify: when you call t_on_branch("N") it means that *aft
On Monday 26 July 2010 10:15:47 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El día 26 de julio de 2010 08:14, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
>
> escribió:
> >> It might be more helpful to think of it as: execution continues right
> >> where it was in the request route, but a branch route is also later
> >> called r
El día 26 de julio de 2010 08:14, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
escribió:
>> It might be more helpful to think of it as: execution continues right
>> where it was in the request route, but a branch route is also later
>> called right before the message is forwarded on the given branch, not
>> in pa
On 07/26/2010 03:19 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 07:22:42 Alex Balashov wrote:
On 07/26/2010 02:14 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
I don't undestand ... so ... execution continues in the next line, just
after append_branch for BOTH branches, but wenever
On Monday 26 July 2010 07:22:42 Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 02:14 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> > I don't undestand ... so ... execution continues in the next line, just
> > after append_branch for BOTH branches, but wenever I call t_relay ...
> > BOTH branches will pass throug
On 07/26/2010 02:14 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
I don't undestand ... so ... execution continues in the next line, just after
append_branch for BOTH branches, but wenever I call t_relay ... BOTH branches
will pass through on_branch_route BEFORE been forwarded?
That's exactly correc
On Monday 26 July 2010 07:02:03 Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 01:59 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> > On Monday 26 July 2010 06:21:56 Alex Balashov wrote:
> >> On 07/26/2010 01:20 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> >>> On Monday 26 July 2010 04:32:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote
On 07/26/2010 01:59 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 06:21:56 Alex Balashov wrote:
On 07/26/2010 01:20 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 04:32:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El día 26 de julio de 2010 01:07, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
On Monday 26 July 2010 06:21:56 Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 07/26/2010 01:20 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
> > On Monday 26 July 2010 04:32:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> >> El día 26 de julio de 2010 01:07, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
> >>
> >> escribió:
> >>> any clue or example about
On 07/26/2010 01:20 AM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote:
On Monday 26 July 2010 04:32:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El día 26 de julio de 2010 01:07, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
escribió:
any clue or example about how to work with the new branch ONLY ? ...
because branch 1 works ok, I nee
On Monday 26 July 2010 04:32:13 Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> El día 26 de julio de 2010 01:07, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
>
> escribió:
> > any clue or example about how to work with the new branch ONLY ? ...
> > because branch 1 works ok, I need to do changes only on branch 2
>
> You must inspec
Yep, what I meant is what Iñaki said.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
1170 Peachtree Street
12th Floor, Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Fax: +1-404-961-1892
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Jul 25, 2010, at 11:32 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
El día 26 d
El día 26 de julio de 2010 01:07, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana
escribió:
> any clue or example about how to work with the new branch ONLY ? ... because
> branch 1 works ok, I need to do changes only on branch 2
You must inspect the $ru (or $du depending the case) in
onbranch_route, and take the d
It sounds like what you need is to do branch-specific logic in a
branch route:
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.0.x#branch_route
Not all functions can be used in a branch route, but those that can be
operate only on that branch.
On 07/25/2010 07:07 PM, Raúl Alexis Bet
17 matches
Mail list logo
