Hello,
On 05/05/15 21:32, Mickael Marrache wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> After making some tests, I found that if I configure the VIP interface
> before the non-VIP one, all works fine.
>
>
>
> listen=tcp:VIP:5060
>
> listen=tcp:nonVIP:5060
>
>
>
> Double RR is still enabled but only one RR header
t know why.
Mickael
From: sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 10:13 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Double record routes
Hello,
do you have mhomed enabled? Are there routes
orwarded to the proxy using the VIP interface.
>
>
>
> *From:*sr-users [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Alex Balashov
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 05, 2015 3:31 PM
> *To:* Mickael Marrache; sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Double re
: Re: [SR-Users] Double record routes
That is normal behaviour if double RR is enabled in the RR module; two
Record-Routes will be added if Kamailio is multihomed and the invite exits a
different interface to the one it entered.
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303
That is normal behaviour if double RR is enabled in the RR module; two Record-Routes will be added if Kamailio is multihomed and the invite exits a different interface to the one it entered.
