Le Wed, 6 Nov 2013 12:48:47 +0100,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
> What defines you set for each of the cases? I see there is an else
> left open inside the #!ifdef, which ends up in getting an append_hf()
> if the define id is set.
Hello Daniel,
thanks, you figured it right: the WITH_NAT
Hello,
On 11/5/13 4:49 PM, Camille Oudot wrote:
Le Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:53:34 +0100,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
Even if the header is not present, insert/append_hf() should not fail
Ok I assumed wrong. The issue looks trickier: I've made tests that go
OK or KO depending on a harmless l
Le Tue, 5 Nov 2013 14:53:34 +0100,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
> Even if the header is not present, insert/append_hf() should not fail
Ok I assumed wrong. The issue looks trickier: I've made tests that go
OK or KO depending on a harmless looking cfg change. In the KO
situation, a Path hea
Hello,
On 11/5/13 12:37 PM, Camille Oudot wrote:
Hi,
I'm using remove_hf() and append_hf() to manipulate the sip headers
on my application. Apparently, calling insert_hf("foo") after
remove_hf("bar") if bar is the last header (not including
Content-Length) is a bad idea, foo doesn't get inserte
Hi,
I'm using remove_hf() and append_hf() to manipulate the sip headers
on my application. Apparently, calling insert_hf("foo") after
remove_hf("bar") if bar is the last header (not including
Content-Length) is a bad idea, foo doesn't get inserted (I understand
that the append_hf() command tries t
