Hi,
On 12/10/2015 01:33 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> I tested an approach in which all initial rtpengine_manage() calls (in
> support of a new SDP offer) were made in a branch_route[], and this
> appeared to work.
>
> Is this the 'orthodox' way to do it?
That's the way we're using it also.
Andrea
I tested an approach in which all initial rtpengine_manage() calls (in
support of a new SDP offer) were made in a branch_route[], and this
appeared to work.
Is this the 'orthodox' way to do it?
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
303 Perimeter Center North, Suite 300
Atlanta, G
Hi,
It is not very clear to me how to handle serial forking scenarios with
rtpengine where there are multiple RTP listeners attached to multiple
network interfaces.
That is to say, given:
rtpengine ... -i net1/xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx -i net2/yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy
1. I attempt to reach SIP gateway 1 vi
