Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-25 Thread Stefan Sayer
o Daniel-Constantin Mierla on 04/24/2012 04:04 PM: Btw, what Asterisk/Sems does in this situation (just for the developers of such end points here :-) ), any special hint-header added? SEMS adds "Retry-After: 0" if the method is NOTIFY. Additionally, you can now ignore the low CSeq for NOTIFY

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Olle E. Johansson
24 apr 2012 kl. 16:04 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > Hello, > > On 4/24/12 3:55 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> 24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update >>> to it in regard to sip c

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 4/24/12 3:55 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: Hello, thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code is really misleading for

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Olle E. Johansson
24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > Hello, > > thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to > it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code > is really misleading for such case . So I searched further in 4xx cla

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code is really misleading for such case . So I searched further in 4xx class, base rfc and other extensions, and could not find anything.

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Sayer
12.2.2 If the remote sequence number is empty, it MUST be set to the value of the sequence number in the CSeq header field value in the request. If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the sequence number of the request is lower than the remote sequence number, the request

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
Hi Daniel, See RFC 3261 section 12.2.2: If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the sequence number of the request is lower than the remote sequence number, the request is out of order and MUST be rejected with a 500 (Server Internal Error) response. However, 400 or some 4xx

[SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I was wondering if someone here can point quickly where specs mention what is the right reply code to send when a request within dialog is received with lower cseq value than the previous request. I couldn't spot the part in the RFC yet, if any related exists. Cheers, Daniel -- Danie