On 02/18/2011 12:53 PM, Thomas Baumann wrote:
Hello Marius,
the main problem I had was caused with wrong debug-level in the
script. Debug level 3 is not a good choice for loadtesting, my
mistake.
After changing to debug level 2, it looks a lot better. I did more
testing with the right settings
Hello Marius,
the main problem I had was caused with wrong debug-level in the
script. Debug level 3 is not a good choice for loadtesting, my
mistake.
After changing to debug level 2, it looks a lot better. I did more
testing with the right settings, and yes the change in pdb.c had some
influence
Hi Marius, Hi Henning,
sorry for the wrong information, the patch did not work for me. I did
not see any timeouts if only one server was used. If more than 2
Servers are used, where are failed calls.
regards,
Thomas
One server old pdb.c:
modparam("pdb", "server", "10.12.18.41:10001")
Feb 16
On Wednesday 16 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote:
> Hello Marius,
>
> thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be
> honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball
> http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/ and found this change. How I can
On 02/16/2011 04:47 PM, Thomas Baumann wrote:
Hello Marius,
thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be
honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball
[http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/] and found this change.
How I can get patch e
Hello Marius,
thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be
honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball
[http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/] and found this change.
How I can get patch e914f97b4 in a better way ?
regards,
Thomas
>
Hello Marius, thanks a lot for submitting the patch. It works like a charm now. But to be honest I had troubles to find this patch, I just checked the daily tarball http://sip-router.org/tarballs/sr/ and found this change.How I can get patch e914f97b4 in a better way ?regards,Thomas>Hello>I hav
2.2011 09:33:05
An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts
On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote:
I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2
instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamailio on
09:33:05
An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts
On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote:
> I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2
> instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamail
Henning Westerholt writes:
> > ps. A small change on the server part was done: handle 4 digit carrier
> > codes.
>
> Ah, i see. I guess its not a big change?
i have done the same change. perhaps it would make sense to make the
module a bit more flexible in terms of length of carrier code.
--
On Friday 11 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote:
> the load I have on one machine is about 10 cps max. The timeout is
> configured to the standard value of 50ms. I the logs I can see that the
> response times are not continuous.
> Feb 11 17:28:34 m-lab-prx-as-2 /openser/sbin/kamailio[7609]: INFO:
nning Westerholt"
Gesendet: 11.02.2011 09:33:05
An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Betreff: Re: [SR-Users] pdb module timeouts
On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote:
> I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2
> instances of PDB Server runs on (1
On Wednesday 09 February 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote:
> I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2
> instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamailio on
> (10.12.19.21). With a small amount of traffic (-cmax 150 -cps 10
> -callduration 3), where are
Hello,
I am using the PDB module and server components for number portability. 2
instances of PDB Server runs on (10.12.19.51/10001/10002), Kamailio on
(10.12.19.21).
With a small amount of traffic (-cmax 150 -cps 10 -callduration 3), where are
timeouts: WARNING: pdb [pdb.c:260]: exceeded time
14 matches
Mail list logo